From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3030C433DF for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC55206DB for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ZP6TXFq4" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8BC55206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:59504 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEMn-0000yg-SP for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:34:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEJ1-0006Hg-0Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:30:51 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:48872 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhEIz-0007m6-GJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:30:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1591371048; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=REZXbo6/ge1uPfdtOP1hHGpJR2810n8nhb5B+dcMaTA=; b=ZP6TXFq4W8ZIyfi43OratMOj8FLvEURo2207+5TibhXmniHUPPPb7gsnox4RRdgAOLpSX8 ObcVoz+OjJPo0w9cMnbSwBp7BenV8lRn/a24tMCjFt7HrsmTtv+qvnmp6lkWh9UmWberk9 1NhUEUmKUnlBVSnRkOubXHrOq6BuTf8= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-489-sQtQN2A1PiOG2l3ryPZF7g-1; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:30:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: sQtQN2A1PiOG2l3ryPZF7g-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id s15so3136254wmc.8 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:30:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=REZXbo6/ge1uPfdtOP1hHGpJR2810n8nhb5B+dcMaTA=; b=UzzxJM5JUN76kGEt57Bj7xGvEIOXibQPTjDuEvgkhKxxqj45IH7VzsWKaFJWzJaGW/ n+dAnuCfaSY+TrfS/uxDtrBerWGsc5kC2VFRFF9h/cquQXrcgYiygm5B5PwwRIrOlFmN raPcSpFiO8ZIe4+k03H6nxt8RVvgrmlB4oAqps0AZJDJgpg2jlH7xhNR+R4Qf7vbxZZp fQh4nNdRnKq+3pv+XgXlVNBeNBU+cJqTanzW5wx2RKrHFN4XqAtyiRfjLqBNFcaCJqQZ r4Hf2N0yHy67SUMK4ewhkoNp58Mb/lNcWIIiQFY2Yqf3X8mhJ4Eddl4/hQ8L20j9XXnI 9KSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532inVY+p1MBSmoatKQShD/Mxvfa9SXKCSg+XcSDBkunNzAo4Gbk 162Fn2JvX98vShIwIO2saTWBJyuG2EqWDMI5tIo7mh/HwLfuySC7eY6CKYVgYrfPwtz3OSOzTm5 qmoAHondqLe9ovao= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:44cf:: with SMTP id z15mr10850218wrr.164.1591371045577; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:30:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHbUddnjDUd5x4YT9T0whXTTCmQB2U+GchiyVNyYzSVUmpAkvwQBbLcKTQP9HmIscxk8ZuBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:44cf:: with SMTP id z15mr10850185wrr.164.1591371045274; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.58] ([151.20.243.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm11598698wrn.38.2020.06.05.08.30.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] exec/cpu: Cleanups around "exec/hwaddr.h" (reserved to system-mode) To: Cornelia Huck References: <20200526172427.17460-1-f4bug@amsat.org> <525ebf16-1265-e403-54b6-e1168d84e4f4@redhat.com> <20200605161801.4bba0d0e.cohuck@redhat.com> <2c5a04c3-0c3b-5acb-d03a-a4649c9222a2@redhat.com> <20200605171356.68475d8d.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <7fbd1eeb-db24-a545-075a-f3f6c69ff088@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:30:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200605171356.68475d8d.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.81; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/05 03:40:54 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: David Hildenbrand , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Roman Bolshakov , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 05/06/20 17:13, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> So, I guess I should unqueue patch 5-7 from s390-next again? >> I can unqueue them too, no problem. > Would probably be easiest, then I can send a pull req in a few minutes. > Go ahead! Paolo