From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C7FC43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D757920675 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dUTzt/Os" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D757920675 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:38908 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icUkB-0000WR-2A for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:31:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icUjD-0008Mb-4b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:30:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icUjB-0007Ta-Sb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:30:03 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:39359 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icUjB-0007TM-Pf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:30:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1575466201; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:openpgp:openpgp; bh=rRLjYxlhZes/kzF4zBZOobG0hp8DyG9ry/28Q215LlM=; b=dUTzt/OsIp7KUV1w+SEugoY7JFebp193xRq96ktxkV/8RIY1itXjhdcWAa7nC55lM2+zDA CzFdcLSBJK6hpH7J+HzhGgQfJv/CoEU+r8HFkoYqAS7Dg5hcQyJCljZczQB4vQ6YPehKdf hKmtjuji9FVCzCwBxRV5bxejzf7+9u8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-203-O7neUIikOVK1vfdKpJBgdw-1; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 08:29:57 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4895A8005B6; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-117-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.39]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0386260BE0; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: virtiofsd: Where should it live? To: Kevin Wolf , Gerd Hoffmann References: <20191126102600.GG556568@redhat.com> <20191126121416.GE2928@work-vm> <87k17ekhs9.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191203105341.GB3078@work-vm> <20191203111949.GB267814@redhat.com> <87o8wofsda.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <20191204081726.md3qakjtszftnuag@sirius.home.kraxel.org> <20191204132810.GB20250@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <7fd86048-ae06-14df-fb68-b0b04b8545ec@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:29:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191204132810.GB20250@dhcp-200-226.str.redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: O7neUIikOVK1vfdKpJBgdw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 207.211.31.120 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , qemu-block@nongnu.org, mszeredi@redhat.com, Jason Wang , QEMU Developers , Markus Armbruster , vgoyal@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , Max Reitz , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 04/12/2019 14.28, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 04.12.2019 um 09:17 hat Gerd Hoffmann geschrieben: >> Hi, >> >>>> | ... >>>> +- qemu-edid >>> >>> Has its own MAINTAINERS section, together with hw/display/edit* and >>> include/hw/display/edid.h. I'm not sure moving it hw/display/ is a good >>> idea. Gerd? >> >> Sort-of makes sense. My personal preference would be a tools/ directory >> for all those small utilities though. > > I think I would like that better than throwing tools into block/ where > currently mostly just block drivers live. +1 for tools/ Thomas