From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lof8t-0006TY-1R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:40:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lof8n-0006R1-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:40:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55435 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lof8n-0006Qs-F2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:40:37 -0400 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]:45102) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lof8m-0006vj-Ks for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:40:37 -0400 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E828D481A8 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from laptop (vaf26-2-82-244-111-82.fbx.proxad.net [82.244.111.82]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C1BD480FC for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:40:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <200903311522.40378.paul@codesourcery.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH][RFC] usb-wacom.c merge into =?utf-8?q?usb-hid.c?= (fwd) From: "=?utf-8?q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Revol" Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:40:38 +0200 CEST Message-Id: <8039932994-BeMail@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Fran=C3=A7ois Revol wrote: > > ping =3F > > There seem to be several unrelated name changes, and several bits of > commented > out code. The latter is always wrong. Disabled code just bitrots. > Either fix > it, or replace it with a comment describing whatever that code was > supposed > to indicate. The names were different in usb-wacom (HID=5FGET=5F* instead of GET=5F*), and those seemed cleaner to use. Simple :%s/// in vim. The first commented line is due to an identical value in the case that I wanted to advertise, and it's why it's tagged [RFC]. The other commented line is just the name of the device, I think I was't sure which to have here, RFC too. Fran=C3=A7ois.