Am 12.02.2025 um 10:32 hat Hanna Czenczek geschrieben:RBD schedules the request completion code (qemu_rbd_finish_bh()) to run in the BDS's AioContext. The intent seems to be to run it in the same context that the original request coroutine ran in, i.e. the thread on whose stack the RBDTask object exists (see qemu_rbd_start_co()). However, with multiqueue, that thread is not necessarily the same as the BDS's AioContext. Instead, we need to remember the actual AioContext and schedule the completion BH there. Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-67115Please add a short summary of what actually happens to the commit message. I had to check the link to remember what the symptoms are.
Reported-by: Junyao Zhao <junzhao@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com> --- I think I could also drop RBDTask.ctx and just use `qemu_coroutine_get_aio_context(RBDTask.co)` instead, but this is the version of the patch that was tested and confirmed to fix the issue (I don't have a local reproducer), so I thought I'll post this first.Did you figure out why it even makes a difference in which thread qemu_rbd_finish_bh() runs? For context: static void qemu_rbd_finish_bh(void *opaque) { RBDTask *task = opaque; task->complete = true; aio_co_wake(task->co); } This looks as if it should be working in any thread, except maybe for a missing barrier after updating task->complete - but I think the failure mode for that would be a hang in qemu_rbd_start_co().
block/rbd.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c index af984fb7db..9d4e0817e0 100644 --- a/block/rbd.c +++ b/block/rbd.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ typedef struct BDRVRBDState { } BDRVRBDState; typedef struct RBDTask { - BlockDriverState *bs; + AioContext *ctx; Coroutine *co; bool complete; int64_t ret; @@ -1269,8 +1269,7 @@ static void qemu_rbd_completion_cb(rbd_completion_t c, RBDTask *task) { task->ret = rbd_aio_get_return_value(c); rbd_aio_release(c); - aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(bdrv_get_aio_context(task->bs), - qemu_rbd_finish_bh, task); + aio_bh_schedule_oneshot(task->ctx, qemu_rbd_finish_bh, task); } static int coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_start_co(BlockDriverState *bs, @@ -1281,7 +1280,10 @@ static int coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_start_co(BlockDriverState *bs, RBDAIOCmd cmd) { BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque; - RBDTask task = { .bs = bs, .co = qemu_coroutine_self() }; + RBDTask task = { + .ctx = qemu_get_current_aio_context(), + .co = qemu_coroutine_self(), + }; rbd_completion_t c; int r;Nothing wrong I can see about the change, but I don't understand why it fixes the problem.