From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP8I1-0005j2-L6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:50:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP8Hv-00076b-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:50:45 -0400 Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:42161) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TP8Hv-00076N-2Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:50:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:50:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <809730556.13355188.1350636637826.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87fw5alwo5.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/25] qemu-sockets: add error propagation to inet_connect_addr List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Orit Wasserman , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com > >> If yes, but it's healed later in the series, the temporary > >> breakage still needs to be spelled out in the commit message. > > > > No, it's not healed, which is why it's mentioned in the commit > > message that future work is needed. > > I really hate "reward" submissions of tons of useful work with demands > for more even work... but here goes anyway: what's your take on > completing the job? Straightfoward, or another ton of work? Straightforward, also because we have exactly one user of asynchronous connection (migration). But I'll let Orit do it. :) Paolo