From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>
Cc: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm/kvm: Enable support for KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:17:47 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80bd3241-f3e2-f5ee-27b9-af5ad76144d4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1b6dffb-0a23-82d2-7699-67e12691e5c4@redhat.com>
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023, Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 12/7/23 11:36, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
>>> + if (kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cs, KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr)) {
>>> + warn_report("The kernel doesn't support the PMU Event
>>> Filter!\n");
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* The filter only needs to be initialized for 1 vcpu. */
>> Are you sure? This is a per vcpu device ctrl. Where is it written in the
>> doc that this shall not be called for each vcpu
>
> The interface is per vcpu but the filters are actually managed per vm
> (kvm->arch.pmu_filter). From (kernel) commit 6ee7fca2a ("KVM: arm64: Add
> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_PMU attribute"):
> To ensure that KVM doesn't expose an asymmetric system to the guest, the
> PMU set for one VCPU will be used by all other VCPUs. Once a VCPU has run,
> the PMU cannot be changed in order to avoid changing the list of available
> events for a VCPU, or to change the semantics of existing events.
I've managed to quote the wrong commit. It's that one:
d7eec2360e3 ("KVM: arm64: Add PMU event filtering infrastructure")
Note that although the ioctl is per-vcpu, the map of allowed events is
global to the VM (it can be setup from any vcpu until the vcpu PMU is
initialized).
Sebastian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-15 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 10:36 [PATCH v4] arm/kvm: Enable support for KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER Shaoqin Huang
2023-12-11 1:49 ` Gavin Shan
2023-12-14 18:13 ` Eric Auger
2023-12-15 9:55 ` Sebastian Ott
2023-12-15 10:17 ` Sebastian Ott [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80bd3241-f3e2-f5ee-27b9-af5ad76144d4@redhat.com \
--to=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).