From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 3/6] s390x/pci: Warn when adding PCI devices without the 'zpci' feature
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:19:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80dae41f-f3f0-1acd-1fd6-8e7473712802@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190130155733.32742-4-david@redhat.com>
On 1/30/19 10:57 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We decided to always create the PCI host bridge, even if 'zpci' is not
> enabled (due to migration compatibility). This however right now allows
> to add zPCI/PCI devices to a VM although the guest will never actually see
> them, confusing people that are using a simple CPU model that has no
> 'zpci' enabled - "Why isn't this working" (David Hildenbrand)
>
> Let's check for 'zpci' and at least print a warning that this will not
> work as expected. We could also bail out, however that might break
> existing QEMU commandlines.
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> index 9b5c5fff60..2efd9186c2 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c
> @@ -826,6 +826,11 @@ static void s390_pcihost_pre_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
> {
> S390pciState *s = S390_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(hotplug_dev);
>
> + if (!s390_has_feat(S390_FEAT_ZPCI)) {
> + warn_report("PCI/zPCI device without the 'zpci' CPU feature."
> + " The guest will not be able to see/use this device");
> + }
> +
> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_PCI_DEVICE)) {
> PCIDevice *pdev = PCI_DEVICE(dev);
>
>
I wonder if someone might misconstrue this as "the _PCI device_ needs
the zpci feature." I think "'zpci' CPU feature required to support
PCI/zPCI devices." reads better. The last sentence is fine to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-04 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 15:57 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] s390x/pci: remaining hot/un)plug patches David Hildenbrand
2019-01-30 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/6] s390x/pci: Fix primary bus number for PCI bridges David Hildenbrand
2019-02-04 22:58 ` Collin Walling
2019-01-30 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] s390x/pci: Fix hotplugging of " David Hildenbrand
2019-02-04 22:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Collin Walling
2019-02-04 23:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-05 9:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-30 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/6] s390x/pci: Warn when adding PCI devices without the 'zpci' feature David Hildenbrand
2019-02-04 20:19 ` Collin Walling [this message]
2019-02-04 21:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " David Hildenbrand
2019-02-04 22:42 ` Collin Walling
2019-02-04 22:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-05 9:32 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-30 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] s390x/pci: Introduce unplug requests and split unplug handler David Hildenbrand
2019-01-31 20:40 ` Collin Walling
2019-01-31 21:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-01 10:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-30 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/6] s390x/pci: Drop release timer and replace it with a flag David Hildenbrand
2019-01-31 20:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Collin Walling
2019-01-31 21:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-01-31 21:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " David Hildenbrand
2019-02-01 10:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-01 10:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-01 10:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-01 10:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-30 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/6] s390x/pci: Unplug remaining requested devices on pcihost reset David Hildenbrand
2019-01-31 20:26 ` Collin Walling
2019-01-31 21:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-01 10:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-01 15:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-05 9:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-30 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] s390x/pci: remaining hot/un)plug patches Cornelia Huck
2019-01-31 20:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] " Collin Walling
2019-01-31 21:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-01 8:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-01 9:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-02-01 15:44 ` Collin Walling
2019-02-05 9:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Cornelia Huck
2019-02-05 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80dae41f-f3f0-1acd-1fd6-8e7473712802@linux.ibm.com \
--to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).