qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: frankja@linux.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	david@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:56:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <811e906a-689e-a53c-706e-5d6217ef3cb2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02dabe89-8df2-90d4-c7f1-5ef951942639@redhat.com>

On 9/10/20 1:50 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 10/09/2020 11.36, Collin Walling wrote:
>> The header contained within the SCCB passed to the SCLP service call
>> contains the actual length of the SCCB. Instead of allocating a static
>> 4K size for the work sccb, let's allow for a variable size determined
>> by the value in the header. The proper checks are already in place to
>> ensure the SCCB length is sufficent to store a full response and that
>> the length does not cross any explicitly-set boundaries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/s390x/event-facility.c |  2 +-
>>  hw/s390x/sclp.c           | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  include/hw/s390x/sclp.h   |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>> index 645b4080c5..ed92ce510d 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/event-facility.c
>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static uint16_t handle_sccb_read_events(SCLPEventFacility *ef, SCCB *sccb,
>>  
>>      event_buf = &red->ebh;
>>      event_buf->length = 0;
>> -    slen = sizeof(sccb->data);
>> +    slen = sccb_data_len(sccb);
>>  
>>      rc = SCLP_RC_NO_EVENT_BUFFERS_STORED;
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> index 69a8724dc7..cb8e2e8ec3 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> @@ -231,25 +231,30 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb,
>>  {
>>      SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
>>      SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
>> -    SCCB work_sccb;
>> -    hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
>> +    SCCBHeader header;
>> +    SCCB *work_sccb;
> 
> I'd maybe use "g_autofree SCCB *work_sccb = NULL" so you don't have to
> worry about doing the g_free() later.

Can do.

> 
>> -    s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
>> +    s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, &header, sizeof(SCCBHeader));
>> +
>> +    work_sccb = g_malloc0(header.length);
> 
> Please use be16_to_cpu(header.length) here as well.

Good catch, thanks!

> 
>> +    s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,
>> +                         be16_to_cpu(header.length));
>>  
>>      if (!sclp_command_code_valid(code)) {
>> -        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
>> +        work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
>>          goto out_write;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, work_sccb.h.length)) {
>> -        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
>> +    if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, work_sccb->h.length)) {
>> +        work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
>>          goto out_write;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
>> +    sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
>>  out_write:
>> -    s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, &work_sccb,
>> -                          be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
>> +    s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,
>> +                          be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length));
>> +    g_free(work_sccb);
>>      sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, SCLP_PV_DUMMY_ADDR);
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -258,9 +263,8 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
>>  {
>>      SCLPDevice *sclp = get_sclp_device();
>>      SCLPDeviceClass *sclp_c = SCLP_GET_CLASS(sclp);
>> -    SCCB work_sccb;
>> -
>> -    hwaddr sccb_len = sizeof(SCCB);
>> +    SCCBHeader header;
>> +    SCCB *work_sccb;
> 
> Maybe g_autofree again?
> 
>>      /* first some basic checks on program checks */
>>      if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
>> @@ -274,33 +278,37 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, uint32_t code)
>>          return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    /* the header contains the actual length of the sccb */
>> +    cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &header, sizeof(SCCBHeader));
>> +
>> +    /* Valid sccb sizes */
>> +    if (be16_to_cpu(header.length) < sizeof(SCCBHeader)) {
>> +        return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      /*
>>       * we want to work on a private copy of the sccb, to prevent guests
>>       * from playing dirty tricks by modifying the memory content after
>>       * the host has checked the values
>>       */
>> -    cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, &work_sccb, sccb_len);
>> -
>> -    /* Valid sccb sizes */
>> -    if (be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length) < sizeof(SCCBHeader)) {
>> -        return -PGM_SPECIFICATION;
>> -    }
>> +    work_sccb = g_malloc0(header.length);
> 
> Needs be16_to_cpu again.
> 
>> +    cpu_physical_memory_read(sccb, work_sccb, be16_to_cpu(header.length));
>>  
>>      if (!sclp_command_code_valid(code)) {
>> -        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
>> +        work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_INVALID_SCLP_COMMAND);
>>          goto out_write;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, work_sccb.h.length)) {
>> -        work_sccb.h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
>> +    if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, work_sccb->h.length)) {
>> +        work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION);
>>          goto out_write;
>>      }
>>  
>> -    sclp_c->execute(sclp, &work_sccb, code);
>> +    sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code);
>>  out_write:
>> -    cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, &work_sccb,
>> -                              be16_to_cpu(work_sccb.h.length));
>> -
>> +    cpu_physical_memory_write(sccb, work_sccb,
>> +                              be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length));
>> +    g_free(work_sccb);
>>      sclp_c->service_interrupt(sclp, sccb);
>>  
>>      return 0;
> 
>  Thomas
> 
> 

Thanks, Thomas!

-- 
Regards,
Collin

Stay safe and stay healthy


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-10 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-10  9:36 [PATCH v5 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] s390/sclp: get machine once during read scp/cpu info Collin Walling
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:45   ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:24     ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-11 14:50       ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/sclp: read sccb from mem based on provided length Collin Walling
2020-09-10 17:50   ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-10 17:56     ` Collin Walling [this message]
2020-09-11 18:16       ` Collin Walling
2020-09-12  6:28         ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:27           ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] s390/sclp: check sccb len before filling in data Collin Walling
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] s390/sclp: use cpu offset to locate cpu entries Collin Walling
2020-09-11  4:33   ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 10:36   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] s390/sclp: add extended-length sccb support for kvm guest Collin Walling
2020-09-11 10:47   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-11 13:41   ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 13:54     ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 14:52       ` Collin Walling
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318 Collin Walling
2020-09-10 11:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-09-10  9:36 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] s390: guest support for diagnose 0x318 Collin Walling
2020-09-11 15:08   ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-11 15:14     ` Thomas Huth
2020-09-15 14:57     ` Collin Walling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=811e906a-689e-a53c-706e-5d6217ef3cb2@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).