From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Anton Nefedov <anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com>,
Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] block/file-posix: Work around XFS bug
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:24:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81bb0f91-2671-c9e5-f791-c7470dfd75ce@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191027123555.GN4472@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2119 bytes --]
On 27.10.19 13:35, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:58:46AM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
>> As for how we can address the issue, I see three ways:
>> (1) The one presented in this series: On XFS with aio=native, we extend
>> tracked requests for post-EOF fallocate() calls (i.e., write-zero
>> operations) to reach until infinity (INT64_MAX in practice), mark
>> them serializing and wait for other conflicting requests.
>>
>> Advantages:
>> + Limits the impact to very specific cases
>> (And that means it wouldn’t hurt too much to keep this workaround
>> even when the XFS driver has been fixed)
>> + Works around the bug where it happens, namely in file-posix
>>
>> Disadvantages:
>> - A bit complex
>> - A bit of a layering violation (should file-posix have access to
>> tracked requests?)
>
> Your patch series is reasonable. I don't think it's too bad.
>
> The main question is how to detect the XFS fix once it ships. XFS
> already has a ton of ioctls, so maybe they don't mind adding a
> feature/quirk bit map ioctl for publishing information about bug fixes
> to userspace. I didn't see another obvious way of doing it, maybe a
> mount option that the kernel automatically sets and that gets reported
> to userspace?
I’ll add a note to the RH BZ.
> If we imagine that XFS will not provide a mechanism to detect the
> presence of the fix, then could we ask QEMU package maintainers to
> ./configure --disable-xfs-fallocate-beyond-eof-workaround at some point
> in the future when their distro has been shipping a fixed kernel for a
> while? It's ugly because it doesn't work if the user installs an older
> custom-built kernel on the host. But at least it will cover 98% of
> users...
:-/
I don’t like it, but I suppose it would work. We could also
automatically enable this disabling option in configure when we detect
uname to report a kernel version that must include the fix. (This
wouldn’t work for kernel with backported fixes, but those disappear over
time...)
Max
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 9:58 [RFC 0/3] block/file-posix: Work around XFS bug Max Reitz
2019-10-25 9:58 ` [RFC 1/3] block: Make wait/mark serialising requests public Max Reitz
2019-10-25 9:58 ` [RFC 2/3] block/file-posix: Detect XFS with CONFIG_FALLOCATE Max Reitz
2019-10-25 10:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-10-25 10:22 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-25 10:35 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-10-25 10:41 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-26 17:26 ` Nir Soffer
2019-10-25 9:58 ` [RFC 3/3] block/file-posix: Let post-EOF fallocate serialize Max Reitz
2019-10-26 17:28 ` Nir Soffer
2019-10-25 13:40 ` [RFC 0/3] block/file-posix: Work around XFS bug Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-25 13:56 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-25 14:19 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-25 14:35 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-10-25 14:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-27 12:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-11-04 14:03 ` Alberto Garcia
2019-11-04 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-04 15:12 ` Alberto Garcia
2019-11-04 15:14 ` Max Reitz
2019-11-04 15:49 ` Alberto Garcia
2019-11-04 16:07 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-25 13:46 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-25 14:16 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-25 14:17 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-25 14:21 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-25 14:56 ` Peter Maydell
2019-10-26 0:14 ` no-reply
2019-10-26 17:37 ` Nir Soffer
2019-10-26 17:52 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-28 8:56 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-27 12:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2019-10-28 9:24 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-10-28 9:30 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-28 9:56 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-28 10:07 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-28 10:10 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-28 11:19 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-28 11:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2019-10-28 11:25 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-29 8:50 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-29 11:48 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-29 11:55 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-29 12:05 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-29 12:11 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-29 12:19 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-10-29 12:23 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81bb0f91-2671-c9e5-f791-c7470dfd75ce@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).