From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvyT9-0005H4-NC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:48:23 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41443 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvyT7-0005Gw-LU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:48:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvyT5-0003fd-VE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:48:21 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:34894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvyT5-0003fV-S8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:48:19 -0400 Received: by yxe10 with SMTP id 10so4095727yxe.29 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 12:48:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: camm@ualberta.ca In-Reply-To: <4BAE44F2.20801@redhat.com> References: <1269497376-21903-1-git-send-email-cam@cs.ualberta.ca> <4BAB30EE.4020509@redhat.com> <8286e4ee1003250924q7cca5e71u8b8b7c6d8b785eb8@mail.gmail.com> <4BAB90BB.5030401@redhat.com> <8286e4ee1003260914u5e6ceee2pf0c00590de182fb6@mail.gmail.com> <4BAE44F2.20801@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:48:17 -0600 Message-ID: <8286e4ee1003281248k204a5bd4tc48e6ccc755918b@mail.gmail.com> From: Cam Macdonell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] Shared memory uio_pci driver List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/26/2010 07:14 PM, Cam Macdonell wrote: >> >>> I'm not familiar with the uio internals, but for the interface, an >>> ioctl() >>> on the fd to assign an eventfd to an MSI vector. =A0Similar to ioeventf= d, >>> but >>> instead of mapping a doorbell to an eventfd, it maps a real MSI to an >>> eventfd. >>> >> >> uio will never support ioctls. > > Why not? Perhaps I spoke too strongly, but it was rejected before http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/756481 With a compelling case perhaps it could be added.