qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>,
	thuth@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
	 richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: walling@linux.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
	farman@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, iii@linux.ibm.com,
	eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, alifm@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/29] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 18:30:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82c91b19-eb26-422b-9f2b-248ccd45b6db@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818214323.529501-8-zycai@linux.ibm.com>



On 8/18/25 5:43 PM, Zhuoying Cai wrote:
> DIAG 320 subcode 1 provides information needed to determine
> the amount of storage to store one or more certificates from the
> certificate store.
>
> Upon successful completion, this subcode returns information of the current
> cert store, such as the number of certificates stored and allowed in the cert
> store, amount of space may need to be allocate to store a certificate,
> etc for verification-certificate blocks (VCBs).
>
> The subcode value is denoted by setting the left-most bit
> of an 8-byte field.
>
> The verification-certificate-storage-size block (VCSSB) contains
> the output data when the operation completes successfully. A VCSSB
> length of 4 indicates that no certificate are available in the cert
> store.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhuoying Cai <zycai@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   docs/specs/s390x-secure-ipl.rst | 10 ++++++
>   include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag320.h  | 22 +++++++++++++
>   target/s390x/diag.c             | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   3 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/specs/s390x-secure-ipl.rst b/docs/specs/s390x-secure-ipl.rst
> index 70e9a66fe0..ddc15f0322 100644
> --- a/docs/specs/s390x-secure-ipl.rst
> +++ b/docs/specs/s390x-secure-ipl.rst
> @@ -23,3 +23,13 @@ Subcode 0 - query installed subcodes
>       Returns a 256-bit installed subcodes mask (ISM) stored in the installed
>       subcodes block (ISB). This mask indicates which sucodes are currently
>       installed and available for use.
> +
> +Subcode 1 - query verification certificate storage information
> +    Provides the information required to determine the amount of memory needed to
> +    store one or more verification-certificates (VCs) from the certificate store (CS).
> +
> +    Upon successful completion, this subcode returns various storage size values for
> +    verification-certificate blocks (VCBs).
> +
> +    The output is returned in the verification-certificate-storage-size block (VCSSB).
> +    A VCSSB length of 4 indicates that no certificates are available in the CS.
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag320.h b/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag320.h
> index aa04b699c6..6e4779c699 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag320.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/ipl/diag320.h
> @@ -11,10 +11,32 @@
>   #define S390X_DIAG320_H
>   
>   #define DIAG_320_SUBC_QUERY_ISM     0
> +#define DIAG_320_SUBC_QUERY_VCSI    1
>   
>   #define DIAG_320_RC_OK              0x0001
>   #define DIAG_320_RC_NOT_SUPPORTED   0x0102
> +#define DIAG_320_RC_INVAL_VCSSB_LEN 0x0202
>   
>   #define DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_SUBCODES 0x80000000
> +#define DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_VCSI     0x40000000
> +
> +#define VCSSB_NO_VC     4
> +#define VCSSB_MIN_LEN   128
> +#define VCE_HEADER_LEN  128
> +#define VCB_HEADER_LEN  64
> +
> +struct VCStorageSizeBlock {
> +    uint32_t length;
> +    uint8_t reserved0[3];
> +    uint8_t version;
> +    uint32_t reserved1[6];
> +    uint16_t total_vc_ct;
> +    uint16_t max_vc_ct;
> +    uint32_t reserved3[11];
> +    uint32_t max_single_vcb_len;
> +    uint32_t total_vcb_len;
> +    uint32_t reserved4[10];
> +};
> +typedef struct VCStorageSizeBlock VCStorageSizeBlock;
Previous versions included a build bug message for the size of this 
structure,
was it dropped by mistake?

>   
>   #endif
> diff --git a/target/s390x/diag.c b/target/s390x/diag.c
> index e67ee57f01..b42cf8fe98 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/diag.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/diag.c
> @@ -191,11 +191,47 @@ out:
>       }
>   }
>   
> +static int handle_diag320_query_vcsi(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t addr, uint64_t r1,
> +                                     uintptr_t ra, S390IPLCertificateStore *qcs)
> +{
> +    g_autofree VCStorageSizeBlock *vcssb = NULL;
> +
> +    vcssb = g_new0(VCStorageSizeBlock, 1);
> +    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, r1, vcssb, sizeof(*vcssb))) {
> +        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (be32_to_cpu(vcssb->length) < VCSSB_MIN_LEN) {
> +        return DIAG_320_RC_INVAL_VCSSB_LEN;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (!qcs->count) {
> +        vcssb->length = cpu_to_be32(VCSSB_NO_VC);
> +    } else {
> +        vcssb->version = 0;
> +        vcssb->total_vc_ct = cpu_to_be16(qcs->count);
> +        vcssb->max_vc_ct = cpu_to_be16(MAX_CERTIFICATES);
> +        vcssb->max_single_vcb_len = cpu_to_be32(VCB_HEADER_LEN + VCE_HEADER_LEN +
> +                                                qcs->max_cert_size);
> +        vcssb->total_vcb_len = cpu_to_be32(VCB_HEADER_LEN + qcs->count * VCE_HEADER_LEN +
> +                                           qcs->total_bytes);
> +    }
> +
> +    if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, r1, vcssb, be32_to_cpu(vcssb->length))) {
> +        s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +    return DIAG_320_RC_OK;
> +}
> +
>   void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>   {
>       S390CPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> +    S390IPLCertificateStore *qcs = s390_ipl_get_certificate_store();
>       uint64_t subcode = env->regs[r3];
>       uint64_t addr = env->regs[r1];
> +    int rc;
>   
>       if (env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_PSTATE) {
>           s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_PRIVILEGED, ra);
> @@ -219,7 +255,8 @@ void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>            * but the current set of subcodes can fit within a single word
>            * for now.
>            */
> -        uint32_t ism_word0 = cpu_to_be32(DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_SUBCODES);
> +        uint32_t ism_word0 = cpu_to_be32(DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_SUBCODES |
> +                                         DIAG_320_ISM_QUERY_VCSI);
>   
>           if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, r1, &ism_word0, sizeof(ism_word0))) {
>               s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
> @@ -228,6 +265,23 @@ void handle_diag_320(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, uint64_t r3, uintptr_t ra)
>   
>           env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_320_RC_OK;
>           break;
> +    case DIAG_320_SUBC_QUERY_VCSI:
> +        if (!diag_parm_addr_valid(addr, sizeof(VCStorageSizeBlock), true)) {
> +            s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ra);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (addr & 0x7) {
> +            s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ra);
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
> +        rc = handle_diag320_query_vcsi(cpu, addr, r1, ra, qcs);
> +        if (rc == -1) {
> +            return;
> +        }
> +        env->regs[r1 + 1] = rc;
> +        break;
>       default:
>           env->regs[r1 + 1] = DIAG_320_RC_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>           break;
Regards,
Jared rossi


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-26 22:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-18 21:42 [PATCH v5 00/29] Secure IPL Support for SCSI Scheme of virtio-blk/virtio-scsi Devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] Add boot-certs to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-11  7:24   ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-11 19:03     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-12  6:42       ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-12 18:05         ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-15  6:44           ` Markus Armbruster
2025-09-15 16:14             ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-15 17:18               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-09-16  5:59                 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-08-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] crypto/x509-utils: Refactor with GNUTLS fallback Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for certificate store Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 17:28   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-08-27 20:13     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] hw/s390x/ipl: Create " Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-26 13:40   ` Jared Rossi
2025-08-28 14:31     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 23:14   ` Farhan Ali
2025-08-28 14:46     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-02 15:15       ` Jared Rossi
2025-09-02 17:55         ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-09  0:54   ` Collin Walling
2025-09-10 20:43     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 320 for Certificate Store Facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-09-09 14:42   ` Collin Walling
2025-08-18 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] s390x/diag: Refactor address validation check from diag308_parm_check Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 320 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-26 22:30   ` Jared Rossi [this message]
2025-08-27 14:35     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 18:14       ` Collin Walling
2025-08-27 21:49   ` Farhan Ali
2025-08-27 22:01     ` Thomas Huth
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 320 subcode 2 Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 17:36   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] s390x/diag: Implement " Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 14:35   ` Jared Rossi
2025-08-28 15:12     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] s390x/diag: Introduce DIAG 508 for secure IPL operations Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] crypto/x509-utils: Add helper functions for DIAG 508 subcode 1 Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 17:44   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] s390x/diag: Implement DIAG 508 subcode 1 for signature verification Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 14:55   ` Jared Rossi
2025-08-27 18:08     ` Collin Walling
2025-08-27 22:18   ` Farhan Ali
2025-08-28 15:01     ` Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Introduce IPL Information Report Block (IIRB) Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Define memory for IPLB and convert IPLB to pointers Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] hw/s390x/ipl: Add IPIB flags to IPL Parameter Block Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 16:30   ` Jared Rossi
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] hw/s390x/ipl: Set iplb->len to maximum length of " Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-27 16:33   ` Jared Rossi
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Facility Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Refactor zipl_run() Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Rework zipl_load_segment function Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add signature verification for secure IPL in audit mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] s390x: Guest support for Secure-IPL Code Loading Attributes Facility (SCLAF) Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add additional security checks for secure boot Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] Add secure-boot to s390-ccw-virtio machine type option Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] hw/s390x/ipl: Set IPIB flags for secure IPL Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle true secure IPL mode Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Handle secure boot with multiple boot devices Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] hw/s390x/ipl: Handle secure boot without specifying a boot device Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] docs/specs: Add secure IPL documentation Zhuoying Cai
2025-08-18 21:43 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] docs/system/s390x: " Zhuoying Cai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82c91b19-eb26-422b-9f2b-248ccd45b6db@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=jrossi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=walling@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zycai@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).