From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1et9gv-0008Ht-4Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 05:19:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1et9gs-00082Z-18 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 05:19:29 -0500 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:51854 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1et9gr-00082N-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 05:19:25 -0500 References: <1519900415-30314-1-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> <1519900415-30314-9-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> <20180305084309.GF2482@sky-dev> <20180305104346.GD7584@xz-mi> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <83f9d85f-a6f8-0fc0-9097-e9f761148bab@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:19:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180305104346.GD7584@xz-mi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/12] hw/pci: introduce pci_device_notify_iommu() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Xu , "Liu, Yi L" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mst@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, alex.williamson@redhat.com, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com On 05/03/2018 11:43, Peter Xu wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:43:09PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 05:06:56PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 01/03/2018 11:33, Liu, Yi L wrote: >>>> + pci_device_notify_iommu(pdev, PCI_NTY_DEV_ADD); >>>> + >>>> pci_setup_sva_ops(pdev, &vfio_pci_sva_ops); >>>> >>>> return; >>>> @@ -3134,6 +3136,7 @@ static void vfio_exitfn(PCIDevice *pdev) >>>> { >>>> VFIOPCIDevice *vdev = DO_UPCAST(VFIOPCIDevice, pdev, pdev); >>>> >>>> + pci_device_notify_iommu(pdev, PCI_NTY_DEV_DEL); >>> >>> Please make the names longer: PCI_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DEVICE_ADDED and >>> PCI_IOMMU_NOTIFY_DEVICE_REMOVED. (This is independent of my other >>> remark, about doing this in generic PCI code for all devices that >>> register SVA ops). >> >> Thanks for the suggestion, will appply. > > Isn't the name too generic if it's tailored for VFIO only? Would > something like PCI_IOMMU_NOTIFY_VFIO_ADD be a bit better? I don't think it's for VFIO only. It's just that VFIO is the only caller of pci_setup_sva_ops. Paolo