From: "Donald Liew" <donaldliew@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] why do qem/arm not clear CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD bit of env->interrupt_request automatically?
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 02:15:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84e41160610071115t75b4ec55vbe656630d5ab9373@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
i'm reading qemu-system-arm code and trying to add some more
evaluation boards support for it. in the 0.8.2 source code i found
something i can't understand, when handling interrupts all other
targets clears this bit after calling do_interrupt, however the arm
target doesn't do this, why? won't this cause problems like redundant
interrupts? any special consideration about this?
donald
next reply other threads:[~2006-10-07 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-07 18:15 Donald Liew [this message]
2006-10-08 2:23 ` [Qemu-devel] why do qem/arm not clear CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD bit of env->interrupt_request automatically? Paul Brook
2006-10-08 7:40 ` Donald Liew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84e41160610071115t75b4ec55vbe656630d5ab9373@mail.gmail.com \
--to=donaldliew@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).