From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/37] target/i386: add core of new i386 decoder
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 10:27:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84f6abe8-ff6a-0a69-d415-1f63b7f57bea@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220911230418.340941-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On 9/12/22 00:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> + case X86_TYPE_B: /* VEX.vvvv selects a GPR */
> + op->unit = X86_OP_INT;
> + op->n = s->vex_v;
> + break;
Could use a comment for where missing vex prefix is diagnosed.
I guess it's one of the "vexN" group markers in the insn table?
> + case X86_TYPE_S: /* reg selects a segment register */
> + op->unit = X86_OP_SEG;
> + goto get_reg;
> +
> + goto get_reg;
Stray goto.
> +
> + case X86_TYPE_V: /* reg in the modrm byte selects an XMM/YMM register */
> + if (decode->e.special == X86_SPECIAL_MMX &&
> + !(s->prefix & (PREFIX_DATA | PREFIX_REPZ | PREFIX_REPNZ))) {
> + case X86_TYPE_P: /* reg in the modrm byte selects an MMX register */
> + op->unit = X86_OP_MMX;
> + } else {
> + op->unit = X86_OP_SSE;
> + }
> + get_reg:
Nesting P into the if works, but it's ugly.
Better to separate it out as
case X86_TYPE_P:
op->unit = X86_OP_MMX;
goto get_reg;
> + case X86_TYPE_W: /* XMM/YMM modrm operand */
> + if (decode->e.special == X86_SPECIAL_MMX &&
> + !(s->prefix & (PREFIX_DATA | PREFIX_REPZ | PREFIX_REPNZ))) {
> + case X86_TYPE_Q: /* MMX modrm operand */
> + op->unit = X86_OP_MMX;
> + } else {
> + op->unit = X86_OP_SSE;
> + }
> + goto get_modrm;
Likewise.
> + case X86_TYPE_U: /* R/M in the modrm byte selects an XMM/YMM register */
> + if (decode->e.special == X86_SPECIAL_MMX &&
> + !(s->prefix & (PREFIX_DATA | PREFIX_REPZ | PREFIX_REPNZ))) {
> + case X86_TYPE_N: /* R/M in the modrm byte selects an MMX register */
> + op->unit = X86_OP_MMX;
> + } else {
> + op->unit = X86_OP_SSE;
> + }
> + goto get_modrm_reg;
Likewise.
> + case X86_TYPE_H: /* For AVX, VEX.vvvv selects an XMM/YMM register */
> + if ((s->prefix & PREFIX_VEX)) {
> + op->unit = X86_OP_SSE;
> + op->n = s->vex_v;
> + break;
Similar to X86_TYPE_B, should this diagnose error if missing VEX?
> + e X86_TYPE_J: /* Relative offset for a jump */
> + op->unit = X86_OP_IMM;
> + decode->immediate = insn_get_signed(env, s, op->ot);
Mailer damage?
> + decode->immediate += s->pc - s->cs_base;
Please consider
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220906100932.343523-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org/
or at least the first half of the patch set, which rationalizes and consolidates the
handing of s->cs_base.
> + default:
> + abort();
g_assert_not_reached().
> +static bool decode_insn(DisasContext *s, CPUX86State *env, X86DecodeFunc decode_func,
> + X86DecodedInsn *decode)
> +{
> + X86OpEntry *e = &decode->e;
> +
> + decode_func(s, env, e, &decode->b);
> + while (e->is_decode) {
> + e->is_decode = false;
> + e->decode(s, env, e, &decode->b);
> + }
> +
> + /* First compute size of operands in order to initialize s->rip_offset. */
> + if (e->op0 != X86_TYPE_None) {
> + if (!decode_op_size(s, e, e->s0, &decode->op[0].ot)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + if (e->op0 == X86_TYPE_I) {
> + s->rip_offset += 1 << decode->op[0].ot;
> + }
> + }
> + if (e->op1 != X86_TYPE_None) {
> + if (!decode_op_size(s, e, e->s1, &decode->op[1].ot)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + if (e->op1 == X86_TYPE_I) {
> + s->rip_offset += 1 << decode->op[1].ot;
> + }
> + }
> + if (e->op2 != X86_TYPE_None) {
> + if (!decode_op_size(s, e, e->s2, &decode->op[2].ot)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> + if (e->op2 == X86_TYPE_I) {
> + s->rip_offset += 1 << decode->op[2].ot;
> + }
> + }
> + if (e->op3 != X86_TYPE_None) {
> + assert(e->op3 == X86_TYPE_I && e->s3 == X86_SIZE_b);
> + s->rip_offset += 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (e->op0 != X86_TYPE_None &&
> + !decode_op(s, env, decode, &decode->op[0], e->op0, decode->b)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (e->op1 != X86_TYPE_None &&
> + !decode_op(s, env, decode, &decode->op[1], e->op1, decode->b)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (e->op2 != X86_TYPE_None &&
> + !decode_op(s, env, decode, &decode->op[2], e->op2, decode->b)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (e->op3 != X86_TYPE_None) {
> + decode->immediate = insn_get_signed(env, s, MO_8);
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* convert one instruction. s->base.is_jmp is set if the translation must
> + be stopped. Return the next pc value */
> +static target_ulong disas_insn_new(DisasContext *s, CPUState *cpu, int b)
Note patch 2 from the cs_base cleanup above changes the return type from disas_insn to bool.
> +{
> + CPUX86State *env = cpu->env_ptr;
> + bool first = true;
> + X86DecodedInsn decode;
> + X86DecodeFunc decode_func = decode_root;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> + if (limit) { --limit; }
> +#endif
> + s->has_modrm = false;
> +#if 0
> + s->pc_start = s->pc = s->base.pc_next;
> + s->override = -1;
> +#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> + s->rex_w = false;
> + s->rex_r = 0;
> + s->rex_x = 0;
> + s->rex_b = 0;
> +#endif
> + s->prefix = 0;
> + s->rip_offset = 0; /* for relative ip address */
> + s->vex_l = 0;
> + s->vex_v = 0;
> + if (sigsetjmp(s->jmpbuf, 0) != 0) {
> + gen_exception_gpf(s);
> + return s->pc;
> + }
Mainline has two longjmp error paths:
(1) insn too long: raise #GP,
(2) insn crosses page boundary, and isn't first in the TB:
undo processing and defer insn to next TB.
> +static inline target_long insn_get_signed(CPUX86State *env, DisasContext *s, MemOp ot)
No need for inline.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-12 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-11 23:03 [RFC PATCH 00/37] target/i386: new decoder + AVX implementation Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 01/37] target/i386: Define XMMReg and access macros, align ZMM registers Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 02/37] target/i386: make ldo/sto operations consistent with ldq Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 8:33 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 03/37] target/i386: REPZ and REPNZ are mutually exclusive Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 8:37 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 04/37] target/i386: introduce insn_get_addr Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 8:39 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 05/37] target/i386: add core of new i386 decoder Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 9:27 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2022-09-12 10:54 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 06/37] target/i386: add ALU load/writeback core Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 10:02 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 07/37] target/i386: add CPUID[EAX=7, ECX=0].ECX to DisasContext Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 10:02 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 08/37] target/i386: add CPUID feature checks to new decoder Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 10:05 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 09/37] target/i386: add AVX_EN hflag Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 10:06 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 10/37] target/i386: validate VEX prefixes via the instructions' exception classes Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 10:39 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-12 10:42 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 11/37] target/i386: validate SSE prefixes directly in the decoding table Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 10:51 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 12/37] target/i386: add scalar 0F 38 and 0F 3A instruction to new decoder Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:04 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 13/37] target/i386: remove scalar VEX instructions from old decoder Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:06 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 14/37] target/i386: Prepare ops_sse_header.h for 256 bit AVX Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:09 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 15/37] target/i386: extend helpers to support VEX.V 3- and 4- operand encodings Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:11 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 16/37] target/i386: support operand merging in binary scalar helpers Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:11 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 17/37] target/i386: provide 3-operand versions of unary " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:14 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 18/37] target/i386: implement additional AVX comparison operators Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:19 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:03 ` [PATCH 19/37] target/i386: Introduce 256-bit vector helpers Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:19 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 20/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x60-0x6f, add AVX Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 11:41 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-13 10:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 11:35 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-12 13:01 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 21/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0xd8-0xdf, 0xe8-0xef, 0xf8-0xff, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 13:19 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 22/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x50-0x5f, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 13:46 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 23/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x78-0x7f, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 13:56 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-14 16:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 24/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x70-0x77, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 14:29 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 25/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0xd0-0xd7, 0xe0-0xe7, 0xf0-0xf7, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 15:06 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 26/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x3a, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-12 15:33 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 27/37] target/i386: Use tcg gvec ops for pmovmskb Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 8:16 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-14 22:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-15 6:48 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 28/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x38, add AVX Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 9:31 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-14 17:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-15 6:50 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 29/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0xc2, 0xc4-0xc6, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 9:44 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 30/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x10-0x17, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:14 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-14 22:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-15 6:51 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-13 10:38 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 31/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x28-0x2f, " Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:24 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 32/37] target/i386: implement XSAVE and XRSTOR of AVX registers Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:27 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 33/37] target/i386: Enable AVX cpuid bits when using TCG Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:28 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 34/37] target/i386: implement VLDMXCSR/VSTMXCSR Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:32 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 35/37] tests/tcg: extend SSE tests to AVX Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:33 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-11 23:04 ` [PATCH 36/37] target/i386: move 3DNow completely out of gen_sse Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-13 10:34 ` Richard Henderson
2022-09-13 10:39 ` [RFC PATCH 00/37] target/i386: new decoder + AVX implementation Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84f6abe8-ff6a-0a69-d415-1f63b7f57bea@linaro.org \
--to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).