qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] vfio/pci: enable vector on dynamic MSI-X allocation
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 19:07:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <861636c9-1368-6250-ea91-db83887db32a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230727072410.135743-3-jing2.liu@intel.com>

On 7/27/23 09:24, Jing Liu wrote:
> The vector_use callback is used to enable vector that is unmasked in
> guest. The kernel used to only support static MSI-X allocation. When
> allocating a new interrupt using "static MSI-X allocation" kernels,
> Qemu first disables all previously allocated vectors and then
> re-allocates all including the new one. The nr_vectors of VFIOPCIDevice
> indicates that all vectors from 0 to nr_vectors are allocated (and may
> be enabled), which is used to to loop all the possibly used vectors
> When, e.g., disabling MSI-X interrupts.
> 
> Extend the vector_use function to support dynamic MSI-X allocation when
> host supports the capability. Qemu therefore can individually allocate
> and enable a new interrupt without affecting others or causing interrupts
> lost during runtime.
> 
> Utilize nr_vectors to calculate the upper bound of enabled vectors in
> dynamic MSI-X allocation mode since looping all msix_entries_nr is not
> efficient and unnecessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jing Liu <jing2.liu@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
>   hw/vfio/pci.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 0c4ac0873d40..8c485636445c 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -512,12 +512,20 @@ static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr,
>       }
>   
>       /*
> -     * We don't want to have the host allocate all possible MSI vectors
> -     * for a device if they're not in use, so we shutdown and incrementally
> -     * increase them as needed.
> +     * When dynamic allocation is not supported, we don't want to have the
> +     * host allocate all possible MSI vectors for a device if they're not
> +     * in use, so we shutdown and incrementally increase them as needed.
> +     * And nr_vectors stands for the number of vectors being allocated.
> +     *
> +     * When dynamic allocation is supported, let the host only allocate
> +     * and enable a vector when it is in use in guest. nr_vectors stands
> +     * for the upper bound of vectors being enabled (but not all of the
> +     * ranges is allocated or enabled).
>        */
> -    if (vdev->nr_vectors < nr + 1) {
> +    if ((vdev->msix->irq_info_flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_NORESIZE) &&

I would add a small helper for this test: vfio_msix_can_alloc_dyn(vdev)

Thanks,

C.


> +        (vdev->nr_vectors < nr + 1)) {
>           vdev->nr_vectors = nr + 1;
> +
>           if (!vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing) {
>               vfio_disable_irqindex(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX);
>               ret = vfio_enable_vectors(vdev, true);
> @@ -529,16 +537,22 @@ static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr,
>           Error *err = NULL;
>           int32_t fd;
>   
> -        if (vector->virq >= 0) {
> -            fd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
> -        } else {
> -            fd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vector->interrupt);
> -        }
> +        if (!vdev->defer_kvm_irq_routing) {
> +            if (vector->virq >= 0) {
> +                fd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
> +            } else {
> +                fd = event_notifier_get_fd(&vector->interrupt);
> +            }
>   
> -        if (vfio_set_irq_signaling(&vdev->vbasedev,
> -                                     VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX, nr,
> -                                     VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER, fd, &err)) {
> -            error_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> +            if (vfio_set_irq_signaling(&vdev->vbasedev,
> +                                       VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX, nr,
> +                                       VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER, fd, &err)) {
> +                error_reportf_err(err, VFIO_MSG_PREFIX, vdev->vbasedev.name);
> +            }
> +        }
> +        /* Increase for dynamic allocation case. */
> +        if (vdev->nr_vectors < nr + 1) {
> +            vdev->nr_vectors = nr + 1;
>           }
>       }
>   



  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-27 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-27  7:24 [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] Support dynamic MSI-X allocation Jing Liu
2023-07-27  7:24 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/3] vfio/pci: detect the support of " Jing Liu
2023-07-27 16:58   ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-07-28  8:34     ` Liu, Jing2
2023-07-28  8:43       ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-07-31  3:57         ` Liu, Jing2
2023-07-31  7:25           ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-07-31  8:40             ` Liu, Jing2
2023-07-27 17:24   ` Alex Williamson
2023-07-28  8:09     ` Liu, Jing2
2023-07-28  8:27       ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-07-28 15:41         ` Alex Williamson
2023-07-28 15:51           ` Cédric Le Goater
2023-07-31  3:51           ` Liu, Jing2
2023-07-27  7:24 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] vfio/pci: enable vector on " Jing Liu
2023-07-27 17:07   ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2023-07-27 17:25   ` Alex Williamson
2023-07-31  7:17     ` Liu, Jing2
2023-07-27  7:24 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] vfio/pci: dynamic MSI-X allocation in interrupt restoring Jing Liu
2023-07-27 17:24   ` Alex Williamson
2023-08-01  7:45     ` Liu, Jing2

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=861636c9-1368-6250-ea91-db83887db32a@redhat.com \
    --to=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).