From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZgNU-0005nv-VY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 07:48:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZgNR-0003dq-Rd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 07:48:16 -0400 References: <86sj20rql4.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <5187ECAD.4050901@suse.de> <86obcorn76.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> <15FCEEAE-FE2D-44B9-9DC3-5419B29D5B16@suse.de> <86a9o7qe3u.fsf_-_@shell.gmplib.org> From: Torbjorn Granlund Sender: tg@gmplib.org Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:48:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Peter Maydell's message of "Tue\, 7 May 2013 11\:39\:06 +0100") Message-ID: <861u9jqadg.fsf@shell.gmplib.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Incorrect handling of more PPC64 insns List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Peter Maydell writes: On 7 May 2013 11:27, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: > Alexander Graf writes: > > There's a certain chance that happens, yes. We don't have instruction > test suites for the PPC target. > > There certainly are more bugs. GMP still crashes all over the place. =20=20 If you want to more seriously test the PPC instructions it might be worth extending risu to cope with more than just the ARM architecture... I am an involuntary tester of lots of software, and a voluntary tester of my own software. I think we should do testing of the software we write ourselves, since we else hurt the productivity of the community. I waste half my hacking time on other hackers' plain bugs. But no, I will not become a voluntary tester of the qemu hackers' untested code... --=20 Torbj=C3=B6rn