From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com,
den@virtuozzo.com, berto@igalia.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/9] block: introduce BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE flag
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 19:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864689e6-e335-e246-db25-26deb95bec3b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16ae4c8c-4296-1583-8a65-055f1b2c02a9@virtuozzo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1951 bytes --]
On 2018-02-01 14:34, Anton Nefedov wrote:
> On 31/1/2018 8:31 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 2018-01-30 13:34, Anton Nefedov wrote:
>>> Offtop: does REQ_ZERO_WRITE override REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED in this
>>> function? at least with !REQ_MAY_UNMAP it looks wrong
>>
>> Looks like zero detection will indeed override compression. I think
>> that was intended, but I don't even have an opinion either way.
>>
>> Of course, it wouldn't be so nice if you tried to compress something and
>> then, because the zero write failed, you actually write uncompressed
>> zeroes... But since zero detection is an optional feature, it might be
>> your own fault if you enable it when you want compression anyway, and if
>> you write to some format/protocol combination that doesn't allow zero
>> writes.
>>
>> Max
>>
>
> Is it detection only? I guess in case the caller sets
> (REQ_ZERO_WRITE | REQ_COMPRESSED) it also fires here.
True, but that's the caller's "fault". One of those things has to take
precedence.
And I've just noticed that when bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes() falls back to
a bounce buffer, it passes the original flags (without
BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE) to bdrv_driver_pwritev(), so compression will take
effect then. So the only result is that we first try a zero write, and
if that fails, we do a compressed write. That sounds reasonable to me.
(I mean, we could do it the other way around, but I firstly I don't
think it matters much and secondly it's probably better this way because
I'd suspect zero writes to be more efficient than compressing the bounce
buffer; at least that's how it is for qcow2.)
Max
> Looks like noone does that though, but for example backup might;
> it supports compression, and it also does a zero detection itself and
> calls write_zeroes() when it can.
> It sets REQ_MAY_UNMAP which should indeed override a compression, but
> unmap might be not supported.
>
> /Anton
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 512 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-18 17:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/9] qcow2: cluster space preallocation Anton Nefedov
2018-01-18 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/9] mirror: inherit supported write/zero flags Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:21 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-29 19:26 ` Eric Blake
2018-01-30 12:15 ` Anton Nefedov
2018-01-30 16:00 ` Eric Blake
2018-01-31 17:20 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/9] blkverify: set " Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:23 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/9] block: introduce BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE flag Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:37 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-30 12:34 ` Anton Nefedov
2018-01-31 17:31 ` Max Reitz
2018-02-01 13:34 ` Anton Nefedov
2018-02-01 18:06 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/9] block: treat BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE as serialising Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:48 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-30 12:36 ` Anton Nefedov
2018-01-31 17:35 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-31 15:11 ` Alberto Garcia
2018-01-31 17:11 ` Anton Nefedov
2018-02-01 14:01 ` Alberto Garcia
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/9] file-posix: support BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:56 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 6/9] block: support BDRV_REQ_ALLOCATE in passthrough drivers Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:58 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 7/9] qcow2: move is_zero() up Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 19:59 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 8/9] qcow2: skip writing zero buffers to empty COW areas Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 20:28 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-30 14:23 ` Anton Nefedov
2018-01-31 17:40 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-31 18:32 ` Eric Blake
2018-01-31 18:35 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-31 18:43 ` Eric Blake
2018-01-18 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 9/9] iotest 134: test cluster-misaligned encrypted write Anton Nefedov
2018-01-29 20:30 ` Max Reitz
2018-01-30 13:03 ` Alberto Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864689e6-e335-e246-db25-26deb95bec3b@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).