qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: anthony.xu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB to 2752KB
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:41:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <867e2a13-b48e-cb85-1eb9-38694e28c172@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1489158897-9206-1-git-send-email-yang.zhong@intel.com>



On 10/03/2017 16:14, Yang Zhong wrote:
> There are a lot of memory allocation during the qemu bootup, which are
> freed later by RCU thread,which means the heap size becomes biger and
> biger when allocation happens, but the heap may not be shrinked even
> after release happens,because some memory blocks in top of heap are still
> being used.Decreasing the sleep and removing qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread()
> lock, which make call_rcu_thread()thread response the free memory in time.
> This patch will reduce heap Rss around 10M.
> 
> This patch is from Anthony xu <anthony.xu@intel.com>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@intel.com>
> ---
>  util/rcu.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/util/rcu.c
> index 9adc5e4..c5c373c 100644
> --- a/util/rcu.c
> +++ b/util/rcu.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
>  }
>  
>  
> -#define RCU_CALL_MIN_SIZE        30
> +#define RCU_CALL_MIN_SIZE        5
>  
>  /* Multi-producer, single-consumer queue based on urcu/static/wfqueue.h
>   * from liburcu.  Note that head is only used by the consumer.
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static void *call_rcu_thread(void *opaque)
>           * added before synchronize_rcu() starts.
>           */
>          while (n == 0 || (n < RCU_CALL_MIN_SIZE && ++tries <= 5)) {
> -            g_usleep(10000);
> +            g_usleep(100);
>              if (n == 0) {
>                  qemu_event_reset(&rcu_call_ready_event);
>                  n = atomic_read(&rcu_call_count);
> @@ -254,24 +254,20 @@ static void *call_rcu_thread(void *opaque)
>  
>          atomic_sub(&rcu_call_count, n);
>          synchronize_rcu();
> -        qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>          while (n > 0) {
>              node = try_dequeue();
>              while (!node) {
> -                qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>                  qemu_event_reset(&rcu_call_ready_event);
>                  node = try_dequeue();
>                  if (!node) {
>                      qemu_event_wait(&rcu_call_ready_event);
>                      node = try_dequeue();
>                  }
> -                qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>              }
>  
>              n--;
>              node->func(node);
>          }
> -        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();

This is wrong.  RCU callbacks currently need the "big QEMU lock",
because they can free arbitrary QOM objects (including MemoryRegions).

Paolo

>      }
>      abort();
>  }
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-10 15:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB to 2752KB Yang Zhong
2017-03-10  8:41 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-03-10 16:05   ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-10 16:07     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-10 19:30       ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-11 17:02         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-10 15:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 2/2] " Yang Zhong
2017-03-10  9:14   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-10 17:40     ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-11 17:04       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-14  5:14         ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-14 10:14           ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-14 21:23             ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-15  8:36               ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-15 19:05                 ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-15 20:21                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-16  2:47                     ` Zhong, Yang
2017-03-16 20:02                     ` Xu, Anthony
2017-03-22 11:46                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-03-22 18:26                         ` Xu, Anthony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=867e2a13-b48e-cb85-1eb9-38694e28c172@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).