From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>,
"Daniel P . Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/functional/m68k: Use proper polling in the next-cube test
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:25:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86c686a7-69b6-4d6b-b454-e28d699588cd@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909074817.84661-1-thuth@redhat.com>
On 9/9/25 09:48, Thomas Huth wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> The next-cube tests currently sleep for 2 seconds to wait for the
> guest's display to come up with the expected results. That's bad
> since there is still a theoretical race left here, and since there
> are two subtests, the whole test takes more than 4 seconds this way.
>
> Looking at what the firmware does, there is a better way instead of
> blindly waiting for two seconds: The firmware is writing some values
> to the FPU registers during a test (and never touches them again
> afterwards, so we can be sure about the final values), so we can
> poll for the right values in those registers to know when we reached
> a state when the display is initialized for sure. We just have to
> also make sure to not look for text anymore that is only printed
> after the FPU test has been done by the guest firmware.
>
> This way the whole tests finishes in less than 1 second here, and
> there should be no race condition here anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/functional/m68k/test_nextcube.py | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-22 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 7:48 [PATCH] tests/functional/m68k: Use proper polling in the next-cube test Thomas Huth
2025-09-09 20:32 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2025-09-22 7:25 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86c686a7-69b6-4d6b-b454-e28d699588cd@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).