From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58188 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PEnRT-0002h6-Fj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:24:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tg@gmplib.org>) id 1PEnRS-00044L-2V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:24:43 -0400
Received: from gmplib-02.nada.kth.se ([130.237.222.242]:50698
	helo=shell.gmplib.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tg@gmplib.org>) id 1PEnRR-00044F-Ty
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:24:42 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn
References: <86eiay344b.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1011062015030.1406@linmac>
From: Torbjorn Granlund <tg@gmplib.org>
Sender: tg@gmplib.org
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:24:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011062015030.1406@linmac> (malc's message of
	"Sat\, 6 Nov 2010 20\:16\:13 +0300 \(MSK\)")
Message-ID: <86wroqmhso.fsf@shell.gmplib.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: malc <av1474@comtv.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

malc <av1474@comtv.ru> writes:

  ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
=20=20
Ah, you're right.  It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
ZF alone, though.  (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
my code.)

I apologize for the false alarm!

--=20
Torbj=F6rn