From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED13FC25B75 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAUy-0003gh-PM; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:25:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAUx-0003eg-9K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:25:27 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sEAUu-0004zY-OY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:25:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1717431923; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+7Btx8fn75aEXqL8zpKpYtvuvm72X24n3ZKdSou2n5c=; b=Q7UCou7aaLz33MnLzFcN5gAhAc8XfEWPQu/M5FTzyclq1A88z7vdtgrl3dOv+Oxl1rsfqQ v1zW3+O6auLjMi9niNRjkyzuv2+rg1et5w98CK3nFsA/0ibRo+sB4wK/+mve/tshQxfYqC KANmPJQ2Rv9iVL3kBVeDoosulfiAZsA= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-252-blrDDr4gPdS_eELS258NSg-1; Mon, 03 Jun 2024 12:25:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: blrDDr4gPdS_eELS258NSg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F998025F9; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.194.201]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100BD49103B; Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:25:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, thuth@redhat.com, Pankaj Gupta , Michael Roth Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] linux-headers: Update to current kvm/next In-Reply-To: Organization: "Red Hat GmbH, Sitz: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnchen=2C?= HRB 153243, =?utf-8?Q?Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer=3A?= Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross" References: <20240603131141.834241-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20240603131141.834241-4-pbonzini@redhat.com> <874jaam30g.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 18:25:17 +0200 Message-ID: <871q5em1si.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Mon, Jun 03 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 5:58=E2=80=AFPM Cornelia Huck = wrote: >> Hm, I'm not sure updating to kvm/next is a good idea ("current kvm/next" >> does not mean anything without a commit hash anyway.) I think we should >> only update to something that's in Linus' tree already... how stable is >> kvm/next? > > It is stable, things are only applied there once UAPI is set. Even > rebasing is very rare. > > The problem here is that if (as is the case for 6.11) the merge window > only opens once QEMU is in freeze, waiting for it would delay merging > the QEMU side by 4 months. In this case, the patches barely missed > 6.10. If we're confident that it's stable, can we please mention a hash? "current" is not very descriptive :)