From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qtests: avoid printing comments before g_test_init()
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:31:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qlfmi9q.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317170553.592707-1-berrange@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. Berrangé"'s message of "Fri, 17 Mar 2023 17:05:53 +0000")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> The TAP protocol version line must be the first thing printed on
> stdout. The migration test failed that requirement in certain
> scenarios:
>
> # Skipping test: Userfault not available (builtdtime)
> TAP version 13
> # random seed: R02Sc120c807f11053eb90bfea845ba1e368
> 1..32
> # Start of x86_64 tests
> # Start of migration tests
> ....
>
> The TAP version is printed by g_test_init(), so we need to make
> sure that any methods which print are run after that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> - const bool has_kvm = qtest_has_accel("kvm");
> - const bool has_uffd = ufd_version_check();
> - const char *arch = qtest_get_arch();
> + bool has_kvm;
> + bool has_uffd;
> + const char *arch;
Why don't you move also the declarations of the variables?
I think that one of the biggest troubles of C is variables that are not
initialized.
All compilers that we support are C99 or later, so we can do that (and
we already do in lot of places.)
And yeap, I know that CodingStyle says otherwise, but I think that what
is wrong is CodingStyle.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-02/msg03836.html
Later, Juan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-23 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 17:05 [PATCH] qtests: avoid printing comments before g_test_init() Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-17 17:08 ` Peter Maydell
2023-03-17 17:28 ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-20 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-23 18:31 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2023-03-24 7:34 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-24 17:29 ` Juan Quintela
2023-03-24 17:39 ` Alex Bennée
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qlfmi9q.fsf@secure.mitica \
--to=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).