From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAFwP-00059n-95 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 04:35:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAFwG-0004ay-6X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 04:35:45 -0500 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:57462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAFwF-0004Zg-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 04:35:35 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp08.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:05:28 +0530 Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by d28dlp03.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A38125805D for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:07:14 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (d28av03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.65]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s139Z8no33423448 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:05:09 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av03.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s139ZBhK015285 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:05:11 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" In-Reply-To: <20140202213202.GA2442@redhat.com> References: <1390921707-15109-1-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <878utx5tw1.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87bnyp4e7k.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140202213202.GA2442@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:05:10 +0530 Message-ID: <871tzk4jzl.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 9pfs troubles (was Re: [PATCH 1/4] hw/9pfs: fix error handing in local_ioc_getversion()) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > Haven't used 9pfs in a while. > I thought these patches are a good time to play with it some more. > I have encountered two issues. > > What I'm doing: > host: qemu a75143eda2ddf581b51e96c000974bcdfe2cbd10. > > /scm/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -m 1g -cpu kvm64 > -smp 2 f20-x64.qcow2 -netdev user,id=foo -redir tcp:8022::22 -device > virtio-net,netdev=foo -serial stdio -fsdev > local,security_model=none,id=fsdev0,path=/lib/modules/ -device > virtio-9p-pci,id=fs0,fsdev=fsdev0,mount_tag=libmodulesshare -fsdev > local,security_model=none,id=fsdev1,path=/boot -device > virtio-9p-pci,id=fs1,fsdev=fsdev0,mount_tag=bootshare -no-reboot > -snapshot > > guest: Fedora 20 > > added this in /etc/fstab: > > bootshare /share/boot 9p trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L 0 0 > libmodulesshare /share/lib/modules 9p trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L 0 0 > > > I have encountered two issues: > > 1. mount failure on boot > If I try to mount on boot through fstab, I get: > [ 2.270157] 9pnet: Could not find request transport: virtio > [ 2.270158] 9pnet: Could not find request transport: virtio Missing 9pnet_virtio.ko module ? > > If I then re-try mount, it succeeds immediately! > > Some kind of dependency issue? > > 2. files immediately in the mounted directory aren't visible on the > guest under /share/boot. > For example, files under /boot on host are not visible > on guest, files under child directories seem visible. can you share more details on this ? /boot permissions. ls -al output on host etc. -aneesh