From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47242)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TrK4p-0005Hu-EC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:05:40 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TrK4j-0002kh-66
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:05:39 -0500
Received: from mail-ia0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175]:46047)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TrK4j-0002kb-24
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:05:33 -0500
Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z3so14074358iad.20
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:05:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <50E7434E.5000305@suse.de>
References: <87ehi3qwzm.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50E7434E.5000305@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:05:28 -0600
Message-ID: <871ue0s51j.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Testing new patch management scripts...
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>   2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a
>>      notification.
>
> Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need
> for a rebase (compared to a rejection of its concept/approach)?

Yeah, I need some sort of tag though for tracking purposes..  Maybe
Rejected-by...

>
> Also, since quite a few of such messages have been appearing on the list
> already, might it make sense to shorten the message and rather link to
> some qemu.org Wiki page to spare subscribers' mailboxes?

I'm focusing at the moment on getting the code in shape to release.  We
can tweak the text bits over time.  Patches will only send one mail
per-thread so it's unlikely that it will ever cause a space problem even
in the stingiest of corporate mailbox quotas :-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> --=20
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=
=BCrnberg