From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:43:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738yc1xfo.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50EB32BB.5040302@de.ibm.com>
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
> On 07/01/13 20:32, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> since
>>>
>>> commit 18b6dade8c0799c48f5c5e124b8c407cd5e22e96
>>> qdev: refactor device creation to allow bus_info to be set only in class
>>>
>>> A user can specify a device that is no_user.
>>> For example on my i386 box, I can add a 2nd kvmvapic device.
>>>
>>> This patch checks for no-user and rejects the device_add.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> I specifically broke this when QOM was introduced because no_user
>> precludes a management tool from constructing a machine directlt.
>
> Breaking it but leaving it in the code doesnt seem to be the right thing.
> The commit message from 18b6dade doesnt give any hint that this is now
> broken and nobody audited the callers of no_user that they handle things
> gracefully.
>
> So whats the plan? Totally remove no_user tree-wide?
One of the reasons I left no_user is that it's exposed to users via
'info qdm'. I don't think it matters anymore so we can probably safely
remove it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Christian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-17 16:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: obey no_user Christian Borntraeger
2013-01-07 14:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-01-07 14:20 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-07 15:24 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-01-07 19:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-07 19:40 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-07 20:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-07 20:16 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-07 20:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-07 22:10 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-07 22:20 ` Peter Maydell
2013-01-07 22:36 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-07 22:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-07 20:40 ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-01-07 21:43 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8738yc1xfo.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).