From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48080)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TDazw-0005cv-PV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:04:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TDazs-0005zy-Oa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:04:24 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:33116)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1TDazs-0005zu-Ji
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:04:20 -0400
Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so8388655obb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 06:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <5056D6D8.6040909@redhat.com>
References: <50532E80.5060905@redhat.com> <87obl6ni1u.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<5056D6D8.6040909@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:04:15 -0500
Message-ID: <87392gssvk.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] directory hierarchy
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> Il 16/09/2012 16:44, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> Thanks for doing this!  I'm of the opinion that something is better than
>> nothing here so I'll resist the urge to argue why blue is the best color
>> for the shed.
>> 
>> But one concern I have: this will be a big source of rebasing.  Perhaps
>> we can schedule this?
>
> From what I've seen so far, rebase copes well with renames.

It does, but git-am doesn't.  I've never had much luck with --3way either.

> But yes,
> I'm willing to maintain the series until the end of October.

Okay, if it gets onerous to maintain, we can try to merge it earlier,
but let's shoot for the end of October for now to give people a chance
to get things merged.

>> Have you done the reorg yet?
>
> I'm 90% through.  I hope to post something for review, and perhaps some
> initial bits, in a couple of weeks or less (depending on other obviously
> more urgent things to do).
>
> But if it's 1 month away, I'd probably prefer to merge the include file
> renaming at the same time.

That's reasonable.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
>> Presumably it's just some make file
>> changes and a bunch of renames?
>
> Mostly; net/ is the hairiest subsystem, otherwise it's pretty
> straightforward.
>
> Paolo