From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 15:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874iyomdat.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_07dfI4rFRpvZA1@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. Berrangé"'s message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:44:37 +0100")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 04:14:30PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> Open questions:
>> ---------------
>>
>> - Deprecations/compat?
>>
>> I think we should deprecate migrate-set/query-capabilities and everything to do
>> with capabilities (specifically the validation in the JSON at the end of the
>> stream).
>>
>> For migrate-set/query-parameters, we could probably keep it around indefinitely,
>> but it'd be convenient to introduce new commands so we can give them new
>> semantics.
>>
>> - How to restrict the options that should not be set when the migration is in
>> progress?
>>
>> i.e.:
>> all options can be set before migration (initial config)
>> some options can be set during migration (runtime)
>>
>> I thought of adding another type at the top of the hierarchy, with
>> just the options allowed to change at runtime, but that doesn't really
>> stop the others being also set at runtime. I'd need a way to have a
>> set of options that are rejected 'if migration_is_running()', without
>> adding more duplication all around.
>>
>> - What about savevm?
>>
>> None of this solves the issue of random caps/params being set before
>> calling savevm. We still need to special-case savevm and reject
>> everything. Unless we entirely deprecate setting initial options via
>> set-parameters (or set-config) and require all options to be set as
>> savevm (and migrate) arguments.
>
> I'd suggest we aim for a world where the commands take all options
> as direct args and try to remove the global state eventually.
Yes.
Even better: make it a job.
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-11 19:14 [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] migration: Fix latent bug in migrate_params_test_apply() Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] migration: Normalize tls arguments Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] migration: Run a post update routine after setting parameters Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:42 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] migration: Fix parameter validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-15 20:59 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-22 16:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-22 17:39 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 13:09 ` Peter Xu
2025-05-26 15:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] migration: Reduce a bit of duplication in migration.json Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 16:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:02 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-16 13:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-16 14:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-17 5:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-17 18:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-18 6:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] migration: Remove the parameters copy during validation Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] migration: Introduce new MigrationConfig structure Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-18 7:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-23 13:38 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 7:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] migration: Replace s->parameters with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] migration: Do away with usage of QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] migration: Replace s->capabilities with s->config Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] migration: Merge parameters and capability checks Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] [PoC] migration: Add query/set commands for MigrationConfig Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 7:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-27 22:14 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-11 19:14 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] [PoC] migration: Allow migrate commands to provide the migration config Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-26 8:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-05-26 15:10 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-14 16:44 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] migration: Unify capabilities and parameters Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:12 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 17:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-04-14 17:40 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-14 19:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-05-15 20:21 ` Peter Xu
2025-04-16 13:44 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2025-04-16 15:00 ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-04-24 9:35 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874iyomdat.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).