From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric Auger" <eauger@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Gavin Shan" <gshan@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] arm/kvm: add support for MTE
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:41:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jryn3uq.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da118de5-adcd-ec0c-9870-454c3741a4ab@linaro.org>
On Fri, Feb 03 2023, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 2/3/23 03:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> +static inline bool arm_machine_has_tag_memory(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> + Object *obj = object_dynamic_cast(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_VIRT_MACHINE);
>> +
>> + /* so far, only the virt machine has support for tag memory */
>> + if (obj) {
>> + VirtMachineState *vms = VIRT_MACHINE(obj);
>
> VIRT_MACHINE() does object_dynamic_cast_assert, and we've just done that.
>
> As this is startup, it's not the speed that matters. But it does look unfortunate. Not
> for this patch set, but perhaps we ought to add TRY_OBJ_NAME to DECLARE_INSTANCE_CHECKER?
Instead of the pattern above, we could also do
VirtMachineState *vms = (VirtMachineState *) object_dynamic_cast(...);
if (vms) {
(...)
>
>> +void arm_cpu_mte_finalize(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + bool enable_mte;
>> +
>> + switch (cpu->prop_mte) {
>> + case ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF:
>> + enable_mte = false;
>> + break;
>> + case ON_OFF_AUTO_ON:
>> + if (tcg_enabled()) {
>> + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mte, cpu)) {
>> + if (!arm_machine_has_tag_memory()) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "mte=on requires tag memory");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + error_setg(errp, "mte not supported by this CPU type");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_arm_mte_supported()) {
>> + error_setg(errp, "mte not supported by kvm");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + enable_mte = true;
>> + break;
>
> What's here is not wrong, but maybe better structured as
>
> enable_mte = true;
> if (qtest_enabled()) {
> break;
> }
> if (tcg_enabled()) {
> if (arm_machine_tag_mem) {
> break;
> }
> error;
> return;
> }
> if (kvm_enabled() && kvm_arm_mte_supported) {
> break;
> }
> error("mte not supported by %s", current_accel_type());
> return;
That's indeed better, as we also see what's going on for the different
accelarators.
> We only add the property for tcg via -cpu max, so the isar check is redundant.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-06 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 13:44 [PATCH v5 0/3] arm: enable MTE for QEMU + kvm Cornelia Huck
2023-02-03 13:44 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] arm/virt: don't try to spell out the accelerator Cornelia Huck
2023-02-03 19:32 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-06 12:46 ` Eric Auger
2023-02-03 13:44 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] arm/kvm: add support for MTE Cornelia Huck
2023-02-03 20:40 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-06 13:10 ` Eric Auger
2023-02-06 16:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-27 15:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-06 16:41 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2023-02-06 13:32 ` Eric Auger
2023-02-06 18:27 ` Richard Henderson
2023-02-15 10:36 ` Eric Auger
2023-02-27 15:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-03 13:44 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] qtests/arm: add some mte tests Cornelia Huck
2023-02-06 18:23 ` Eric Auger
2023-02-10 15:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-27 15:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-15 10:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-02-16 17:30 ` Eric Auger
2023-02-16 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] arm: enable MTE for QEMU + kvm Peter Maydell
2023-02-16 11:46 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jryn3uq.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).