qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>
Cc: zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, euler.robot@huawei.com,
	dgilbert@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] migration/multifd: fix memleaks in multifd_new_send_channel_async
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 10:42:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kstjvyk.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506095416.26099-2-pannengyuan@huawei.com> (Pan Nengyuan's message of "Wed, 6 May 2020 05:54:15 -0400")

Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com> wrote:
> When error happen in multifd_new_send_channel_async, 'sioc' will not be used
> to create the multifd_send_thread. Let's free it to avoid a memleak. And also
> do error_free after migrate_set_error() to avoid another leak in the same place.
>
> The leak stack:
> Direct leak of 2880 byte(s) in 8 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x7f20b5118ae8 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xefae8)
>     #1 0x7f20b44df1d5 in g_malloc (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x531d5)
>     #2 0x564133bce18b in object_new_with_type /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/qom/object.c:683
>     #3 0x564133eea950 in qio_channel_socket_new /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/io/channel-socket.c:56
>     #4 0x5641339cfe4f in socket_send_channel_create /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/migration/socket.c:37
>     #5 0x564133a10328 in multifd_save_setup /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/migration/multifd.c:772
>     #6 0x5641339cebed in migrate_fd_connect /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/migration/migration.c:3530
>     #7 0x5641339d15e4 in migration_channel_connect /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/migration/channel.c:92
>     #8 0x5641339cf5b7 in socket_outgoing_migration /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/migration/socket.c:108
>
> Direct leak of 384 byte(s) in 8 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x7f20b5118cf0 in calloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xefcf0)
>     #1 0x7f20b44df22d in g_malloc0 (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5322d)
>     #2 0x56413406fc17 in error_setv /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/error.c:61
>     #3 0x564134070464 in error_setg_errno_internal /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/error.c:109
>     #4 0x5641340851be in inet_connect_addr /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/qemu-sockets.c:379
>     #5 0x5641340851be in inet_connect_saddr /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/qemu-sockets.c:458
>     #6 0x5641340870ab in socket_connect /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/qemu-sockets.c:1105
>     #7 0x564133eeaabf in qio_channel_socket_connect_sync /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/io/channel-socket.c:145
>     #8 0x564133eeabf5 in qio_channel_socket_connect_worker /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/io/channel-socket.c:168
>
> Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 8 object(s) allocated from:
>     #0 0x7f20b5118ae8 in __interceptor_malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xefae8)
>     #1 0x7f20af901817 in __GI___vasprintf_chk (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x10d817)
>     #2 0x7f20b451fa6c in g_vasprintf (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x93a6c)
>     #3 0x7f20b44f8cd0 in g_strdup_vprintf (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6ccd0)
>     #4 0x7f20b44f8d8c in g_strdup_printf (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x6cd8c)
>     #5 0x56413406fc86 in error_setv /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/error.c:65
>     #6 0x564134070464 in error_setg_errno_internal /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/error.c:109
>     #7 0x5641340851be in inet_connect_addr /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/qemu-sockets.c:379
>     #8 0x5641340851be in inet_connect_saddr /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/qemu-sockets.c:458
>     #9 0x5641340870ab in socket_connect /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/util/qemu-sockets.c:1105
>     #10 0x564133eeaabf in qio_channel_socket_connect_sync /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/io/channel-socket.c:145
>     #11 0x564133eeabf5 in qio_channel_socket_connect_worker /mnt/sdb/backup/qemu/io/channel-socket.c:168
>
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

I am not sure that this are the only possible error cases, but they are
a step on the right direction.

Thanks, Juan.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-06  9:54 [PATCH 0/2] migration/multifd: fix two memleaks Pan Nengyuan
2020-05-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] migration/multifd: fix memleaks in multifd_new_send_channel_async Pan Nengyuan
2020-05-06  8:42   ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2020-05-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] migration/multifd: Do error_free after migrate_set_error to avoid memleaks Pan Nengyuan
2020-05-06  8:43   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-07 15:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] migration/multifd: fix two memleaks Dr. David Alan Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874kstjvyk.fsf@secure.mitica \
    --to=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=euler.robot@huawei.com \
    --cc=pannengyuan@huawei.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).