From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39592)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1ZvqQX-0007De-6K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:40:21 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1ZvqQU-0007Ww-HX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:40:21 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42319)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <quintela@redhat.com>) id 1ZvqQU-0007Wq-C2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:40:18 -0500
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_q_1iOvBrwrndJrh-aD=oreL_AtJd02thfbkP+BD3+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Peter Maydell's message of "Mon, 9 Nov 2015 17:33:29 +0000")
References: <1447090141-29074-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_q_1iOvBrwrndJrh-aD=oreL_AtJd02thfbkP+BD3+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:40:15 +0100
Message-ID: <874mgv9im8.fsf@emacs.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/57] Migration pull
Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 9 November 2015 at 17:28, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> two items:
>>
>> - Postcopy pull request (dave)
>> - fix for qemu_completion (Denis)
>>
>> Please apply.
>
> 57 patches three days before hard freeze? Are you *really* sure about this?

1 is a fix.
We were expecting postcopy to be in for 2.5.
and it got 3 full reviews in the last two weeks.
We haven't had a single complaint on the review process.


Majority of the code is of the type:

if (postcopy) {

} else {


}

Shouldn't affect precopy (famous last words).


So my vote is yes.

Later, Juan.