From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlClN-0003B6-17 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:45:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlClJ-0000jW-Q5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:45:36 -0400 Received: from e28smtp01.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.1]:58243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlClI-0000jC-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 04:45:33 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp01.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:15:29 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14E0E0044 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:18:07 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t3N8jQsW55902252 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:15:27 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t3N8JoXa027542 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:49:50 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" In-Reply-To: <878udjxp1x.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1427723836-302-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> <20150420132557.GA32653@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <878udjxp1x.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:15:26 +0530 Message-ID: <874mo7xmft.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] virtfs-proxy-helper: small fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org "Aneesh Kumar K.V" writes: > Stefan Hajnoczi writes: > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:57:14PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> These fixes are not critical but it wouldn't hurt to get them into QEMU 2.3. >>> I am not sure whether this is critical enough to go to Qemu 2.3 ? If so I can send a pull request. I have already pushed the changes after testing to https://github.com/kvaneesh/qemu.git tags/for-upstream-signed -aneesh