From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:55:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nm4u1in.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507333F1.1060000@redhat.com>
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
>>> So we could have for virtio something like this:
>>>
>>> Capabilities: [??] virtio-regs:
>>> legacy: BAR=0 offset=0
>>> virtio-pci: BAR=1 offset=1000
>>> virtio-cfg: BAR=1 offset=1800
>>
>> This would be a vendor specific PCI capability so lspci wouldn't
>> automatically know how to parse it.
>
> Sure, would need a patch to actually parse+print the cap,
> /me was just trying to make my point clear in a simple way.
>
>>>>> 2) ISTR an argument about mapping the ISR register separately, for
>>>>> performance, but I can't find a reference to it.
>>>>
>>>> I think the rationale is that ISR really needs to be PIO but everything
>>>> else doesn't. PIO is much faster on x86 because it doesn't require
>>>> walking page tables or instruction emulation to handle the exit.
>>>
>>> Is this still a pressing issue? With MSI-X enabled ISR isn't needed,
>>> correct? Which would imply that pretty much only old guests without
>>> MSI-X support need this, and we don't need to worry that much when
>>> designing something new ...
>>
>> It wasn't that long ago that MSI-X wasn't supported.. I think we should
>> continue to keep ISR as PIO as it is a fast path.
>
> No problem if we allow to have both legacy layout and new layout at the
> same time. Guests can continue to use ISR @ BAR0 in PIO space for
> existing virtio devices, even in case they want use mmio for other
> registers -> all fine.
>
> New virtio devices can support MSI-X from day one and decide to not
> expose a legacy layout PIO bar.
I think having BAR1 be an MMIO mirror of the registers + a BAR2 for
virtio configuration space is probably not that bad of a solution.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-27 0:29 [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization Rusty Russell
2012-10-04 18:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 2:21 ` [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location Rusty Russell
2012-10-08 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 14:58 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-08 15:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 20:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-08 20:55 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-10-08 23:56 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 1:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 3:16 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-09 14:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 13:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-10 3:44 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 11:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-09 21:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-10-10 3:44 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-11 0:08 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 6:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-09 15:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 20:24 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-10 2:54 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 13:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-10 13:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11 0:43 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 8:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-10 8:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11 1:18 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-11 10:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11 22:29 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-12 9:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-12 9:51 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-12 10:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-16 13:15 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-16 13:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-16 13:52 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization Cornelia Huck
2012-10-10 3:46 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874nm4u1in.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).