qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:55:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nm4u1in.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507333F1.1060000@redhat.com>

Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> writes:

>   Hi,
>
>>> So we could have for virtio something like this:
>>>
>>>         Capabilities: [??] virtio-regs:
>>>                 legacy: BAR=0 offset=0
>>>                 virtio-pci: BAR=1 offset=1000
>>>                 virtio-cfg: BAR=1 offset=1800
>> 
>> This would be a vendor specific PCI capability so lspci wouldn't
>> automatically know how to parse it.
>
> Sure, would need a patch to actually parse+print the cap,
> /me was just trying to make my point clear in a simple way.
>
>>>>> 2) ISTR an argument about mapping the ISR register separately, for
>>>>>    performance, but I can't find a reference to it.
>>>>
>>>> I think the rationale is that ISR really needs to be PIO but everything
>>>> else doesn't.  PIO is much faster on x86 because it doesn't require
>>>> walking page tables or instruction emulation to handle the exit.
>>>
>>> Is this still a pressing issue?  With MSI-X enabled ISR isn't needed,
>>> correct?  Which would imply that pretty much only old guests without
>>> MSI-X support need this, and we don't need to worry that much when
>>> designing something new ...
>> 
>> It wasn't that long ago that MSI-X wasn't supported..  I think we should
>> continue to keep ISR as PIO as it is a fast path.
>
> No problem if we allow to have both legacy layout and new layout at the
> same time.  Guests can continue to use ISR @ BAR0 in PIO space for
> existing virtio devices, even in case they want use mmio for other
> registers -> all fine.
>
> New virtio devices can support MSI-X from day one and decide to not
> expose a legacy layout PIO bar.

I think having BAR1 be an MMIO mirror of the registers + a BAR2 for
virtio configuration space is probably not that bad of a solution.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> cheers,
>   Gerd
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-08 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27  0:29 [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization Rusty Russell
2012-10-04 18:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08  2:21   ` [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location Rusty Russell
2012-10-08 13:58     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 14:58       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-08 15:09         ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-08 20:13           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-08 20:55             ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-10-08 23:56               ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09  1:51                 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09  3:16                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 10:17                     ` Avi Kivity
2012-10-09 14:03                       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 13:56                     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-10  3:44                       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 11:37                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-09 21:09                     ` Jamie Lokier
2012-10-10  3:44                       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-11  0:08                         ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09  6:33                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-09 15:26                     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-09 20:24                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-10-10  2:54                         ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10 13:36                           ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-10 13:41                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11  0:43                               ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-10  8:34                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-10  8:30     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11  1:18       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-11 10:23         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-11 22:29           ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-12  9:33             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-12  9:51               ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-12 10:02                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-16 13:15                   ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-16 13:30                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-10-16 13:52                       ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 14:02 ` [Qemu-devel] Proposal for virtio standardization Cornelia Huck
2012-10-10  3:46   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874nm4u1in.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).