qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Pavel Dovgalyuk <dovgaluk@ispras.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/arm: Remove unnecessary gen_io_end() calls
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:15:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zbnugd1.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200619170324.12093-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>


Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> Since commit ba3e7926691ed3 it has been unnecessary for target code
> to call gen_io_end() after an IO instruction in icount mode; it is
> sufficient to call gen_io_start() before it and to force the end of
> the TB.
>
> Many now-unnecessary calls to gen_io_end() were removed in commit
> 9e9b10c6491153b, but some were missed or accidentally added later.
> Remove unneeded calls from the arm target:
>
>  * the call in the handling of exception-return-via-LDM is
>    unnecessary, and the code is already forcing end-of-TB
>  * the call in the VFP access check code is more complicated:
>    we weren't ending the TB, so we need to add the code to
>    force that by setting DISAS_UPDATE

That was the thing I was staring at trying to puzzle out.

I guess going forward we want to base the base DisasContext to
gen_io_start so we can flip a bit and then assert we don't start a new
instruction having already handled an IO instruction which should have
been the last one.

>  * the doc comment for ARM_CP_IO doesn't need to mention
>    gen_io_end() any more
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

-- 
Alex Bennée


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-19 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-19 17:03 [PATCH] target/arm: Remove unnecessary gen_io_end() calls Peter Maydell
2020-06-19 17:15 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2020-06-19 17:24 ` no-reply
2020-06-20  0:23 ` Richard Henderson
2020-06-22  7:17 ` Pavel Dovgalyuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875zbnugd1.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).