qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] exec: Move cpu_physical_memory_* functions to 'exec/memory-internal.h'
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 10:12:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zd6g7zu.fsf@secure.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507173958.25894-11-philmd@redhat.com> ("Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"'s message of "Thu, 7 May 2020 19:39:58 +0200")

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>

Once here, can someone give a test that meassures if it makes sense that
this functions are inline?
They are relatively big, and I would preffer them to be in a .c file,
but I have no clue about how performance critical they are.

Again, this include was another of the reasons that migration/ram.c
can't be make target agnostic.

Later, Juan.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07 17:39 [PATCH 00/10] exec: Shear 'exec/ram_addr.h' and make NVMe device target-agnostic Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] exec: Rename qemu_ram_writeback() as qemu_ram_msync() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  7:59   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] exec/ramblock: Add missing 'qemu/rcu.h' include Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  7:59   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] exec: Move tb_invalidate_phys_range() to 'exec/exec-all.h' Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] exec/memory-internal: Check CONFIG_SOFTMMU instead of CONFIG_USER_ONLY Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  8:01   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] exec: Move qemu_minrampagesize/qemu_maxrampagesize to 'qemu-common.h' Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  8:03   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-08  9:09   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-11  1:32   ` David Gibson
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] exec: Move ramblock_recv_bitmap_offset() to migration/ram.c Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  8:07   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-08  9:27     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 07/10] exec: Move all RAMBlock functions to 'exec/ramblock.h' Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  8:08   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-08  9:32   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-05-11  1:33   ` David Gibson
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 08/10] hw/block: Let the NVMe emulated device be target-agnostic Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-07 17:42   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  8:09   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 09/10] exec: Update coding style to make checkpatch.pl happy Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  9:05   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-07 17:39 ` [PATCH 10/10] exec: Move cpu_physical_memory_* functions to 'exec/memory-internal.h' Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-05-08  8:12   ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2020-05-11  1:35   ` David Gibson
2020-05-07 22:15 ` [PATCH 00/10] exec: Shear 'exec/ram_addr.h' and make NVMe device target-agnostic Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-08  8:21   ` Juan Quintela
2020-05-08  6:19 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875zd6g7zu.fsf@secure.mitica \
    --to=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).