From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 fused multiply-add
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 12:25:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zw82m9u.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181124235553.17371-12-cota@braap.org>
Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org> writes:
> Performance results for fp-bench:
>
> 1. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
> - before:
> fma-single: 74.73 MFlops
> fma-double: 74.54 MFlops
> - after:
> fma-single: 203.37 MFlops
> fma-double: 169.37 MFlops
>
> 2. ARM Aarch64 A57 @ 2.4GHz
> - before:
> fma-single: 23.24 MFlops
> fma-double: 23.70 MFlops
> - after:
> fma-single: 66.14 MFlops
> fma-double: 63.10 MFlops
>
> 3. IBM POWER8E @ 2.1 GHz
> - before:
> fma-single: 37.26 MFlops
> fma-double: 37.29 MFlops
> - after:
> fma-single: 48.90 MFlops
> fma-double: 59.51 MFlops
>
> Here having 3FP64 set to 1 pays off for x86_64:
> [1] 170.15 vs [0] 153.12 MFlops
>
> Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> fpu/softfloat.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fpu/softfloat.c b/fpu/softfloat.c
> index e35ebfaae7..e03feafb6f 100644
> --- a/fpu/softfloat.c
> +++ b/fpu/softfloat.c
> @@ -1514,8 +1514,9 @@ float16 QEMU_FLATTEN float16_muladd(float16 a, float16 b, float16 c,
> return float16_round_pack_canonical(pr, status);
> }
>
> -float32 QEMU_FLATTEN float32_muladd(float32 a, float32 b, float32 c,
> - int flags, float_status *status)
> +static float32 QEMU_SOFTFLOAT_ATTR
> +soft_f32_muladd(float32 a, float32 b, float32 c, int flags,
> + float_status *status)
> {
> FloatParts pa = float32_unpack_canonical(a, status);
> FloatParts pb = float32_unpack_canonical(b, status);
> @@ -1525,8 +1526,9 @@ float32 QEMU_FLATTEN float32_muladd(float32 a, float32 b, float32 c,
> return float32_round_pack_canonical(pr, status);
> }
>
> -float64 QEMU_FLATTEN float64_muladd(float64 a, float64 b, float64 c,
> - int flags, float_status *status)
> +static float64 QEMU_SOFTFLOAT_ATTR
> +soft_f64_muladd(float64 a, float64 b, float64 c, int flags,
> + float_status *status)
> {
> FloatParts pa = float64_unpack_canonical(a, status);
> FloatParts pb = float64_unpack_canonical(b, status);
> @@ -1536,6 +1538,128 @@ float64 QEMU_FLATTEN float64_muladd(float64 a, float64 b, float64 c,
> return float64_round_pack_canonical(pr, status);
> }
>
> +float32 QEMU_FLATTEN
> +float32_muladd(float32 xa, float32 xb, float32 xc, int flags, float_status *s)
> +{
> + union_float32 ua, ub, uc, ur;
> +
> + ua.s = xa;
> + ub.s = xb;
> + uc.s = xc;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!can_use_fpu(s))) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> + if (unlikely(flags & float_muladd_halve_result)) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> +
> + float32_input_flush3(&ua.s, &ub.s, &uc.s, s);
> + if (unlikely(!f32_is_zon3(ua, ub, uc))) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> + /*
> + * When (a || b) == 0, there's no need to check for under/over flow,
> + * since we know the addend is (normal || 0) and the product is 0.
> + */
> + if (float32_is_zero(ua.s) || float32_is_zero(ub.s)) {
> + union_float32 up;
> + bool prod_sign;
> +
> + prod_sign = float32_is_neg(ua.s) ^ float32_is_neg(ub.s);
> + prod_sign ^= !!(flags & float_muladd_negate_product);
> + up.s = float32_set_sign(float32_zero, prod_sign);
> +
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_c) {
> + uc.h = -uc.h;
> + }
> + ur.h = up.h + uc.h;
> + } else {
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_product) {
> + ua.h = -ua.h;
> + }
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_c) {
> + uc.h = -uc.h;
> + }
> +
> + ur.h = fmaf(ua.h, ub.h, uc.h);
> +
> + if (unlikely(f32_is_inf(ur))) {
> + s->float_exception_flags |= float_flag_overflow;
> + } else if (unlikely(fabsf(ur.h) <= FLT_MIN)) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> + }
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_result) {
> + return float32_chs(ur.s);
> + }
> + return ur.s;
> +
> + soft:
> + return soft_f32_muladd(ua.s, ub.s, uc.s, flags, s);
> +}
> +
> +float64 QEMU_FLATTEN
> +float64_muladd(float64 xa, float64 xb, float64 xc, int flags, float_status *s)
> +{
> + union_float64 ua, ub, uc, ur;
> +
> + ua.s = xa;
> + ub.s = xb;
> + uc.s = xc;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!can_use_fpu(s))) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> + if (unlikely(flags & float_muladd_halve_result)) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> +
> + float64_input_flush3(&ua.s, &ub.s, &uc.s, s);
> + if (unlikely(!f64_is_zon3(ua, ub, uc))) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> + /*
> + * When (a || b) == 0, there's no need to check for under/over flow,
> + * since we know the addend is (normal || 0) and the product is 0.
> + */
> + if (float64_is_zero(ua.s) || float64_is_zero(ub.s)) {
> + union_float64 up;
> + bool prod_sign;
> +
> + prod_sign = float64_is_neg(ua.s) ^ float64_is_neg(ub.s);
> + prod_sign ^= !!(flags & float_muladd_negate_product);
> + up.s = float64_set_sign(float64_zero, prod_sign);
> +
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_c) {
> + uc.h = -uc.h;
> + }
> + ur.h = up.h + uc.h;
> + } else {
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_product) {
> + ua.h = -ua.h;
> + }
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_c) {
> + uc.h = -uc.h;
> + }
> +
> + ur.h = fma(ua.h, ub.h, uc.h);
> +
> + if (unlikely(f64_is_inf(ur))) {
> + s->float_exception_flags |= float_flag_overflow;
> + } else if (unlikely(fabs(ur.h) <= FLT_MIN)) {
> + goto soft;
> + }
> + }
> + if (flags & float_muladd_negate_result) {
> + return float64_chs(ur.s);
> + }
> + return ur.s;
> +
> + soft:
> + return soft_f64_muladd(ua.s, ub.s, uc.s, flags, s);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Returns the result of dividing the floating-point value `a' by the
> * corresponding value `b'. The operation is performed according to
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-24 23:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/13] hardfloat Emilio G. Cota
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/13] fp-test: pick TARGET_ARM to get its specialization Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-03 12:13 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/13] softfloat: add float{32, 64}_is_{de, }normal Emilio G. Cota
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/13] target/tricore: use float32_is_denormal Emilio G. Cota
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/13] softfloat: rename canonicalize to sf_canonicalize Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-03 14:16 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 05/13] softfloat: add float{32, 64}_is_zero_or_normal Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-03 14:16 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 06/13] tests/fp: add fp-bench Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-03 14:29 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 07/13] fpu: introduce hardfloat Emilio G. Cota
2018-11-25 0:25 ` Aleksandar Markovic
2018-11-25 1:25 ` Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-04 12:28 ` Alex Bennée
2018-12-04 13:33 ` Richard Henderson
2018-12-04 13:52 ` Alex Bennée
2018-12-04 17:31 ` Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-04 19:08 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 addition and subtraction Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-04 18:34 ` Alex Bennée
2018-12-04 20:07 ` Emilio G. Cota
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 09/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 multiplication Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-05 10:10 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 10/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 division Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-05 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 fused multiply-add Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-05 12:25 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 12/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 square root Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-05 12:26 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-24 23:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 13/13] hardfloat: implement float32/64 comparison Emilio G. Cota
2018-12-05 12:36 ` Alex Bennée
2018-11-27 17:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/13] hardfloat no-reply
2018-11-27 17:52 ` Emilio G. Cota
2018-11-27 17:32 ` no-reply
2018-12-05 12:41 ` Alex Bennée
2018-12-05 16:47 ` Emilio G. Cota
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875zw82m9u.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=cota@braap.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).