From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAJd7-00021G-PK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:17:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAJd4-0006AP-Kc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:17:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAJd4-0006A1-E1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 13:17:54 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20170515135848.GL1201@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (Stefan Hajnoczi's message of "Mon, 15 May 2017 14:58:48 +0100") References: <20170512155249.8853-1-quintela@redhat.com> <20170515135848.GL1201@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 19:17:35 +0200 Message-ID: <8760h2dopc.fsf@secure.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/5] Migration pull request List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lvivier@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 05:52:44PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Hi >> >> > > Thanks, applied to my staging tree: > https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/staging Hi As fast as I sent the PULL request, more comments appeared. What do you preffer? - drop the whole PULL request? - drop the patch: migration: Create block capabilities for shared and enable it has zero conflicts with the other patches - let the PULL alone and I will sent fixes on top of that? I would preffer option two, but that is up to you. Sorry for the inconvenience. Later, Juan.