From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55687) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ07p-0006WT-9i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 06:54:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ07k-0002Ho-N7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 06:54:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ07k-0002HQ-Cs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 06:54:48 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q92AslHB006452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 06:54:47 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <5061986B.3070503@redhat.com> (Orit Wasserman's message of "Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:41:31 +0200") References: <1348217255-22441-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <1348217255-22441-18-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <5061986B.3070503@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:54:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87626t9ma1.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/41] buffered_file: rename opaque to migration_state Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Orit Wasserman Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Orit Wasserman wrote: > On 09/21/2012 11:47 AM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >> --- >> buffered_file.c | 12 ++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/buffered_file.c b/buffered_file.c >> index 7155800..33b700b 100644 >> --- a/buffered_file.c >> +++ b/buffered_file.c >> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ typedef struct QEMUFileBuffered >> BufferedPutReadyFunc *put_ready; >> BufferedWaitForUnfreezeFunc *wait_for_unfreeze; >> BufferedCloseFunc *close; >> - void *opaque; >> + void *migration_state; > Why ? > This doesn't have to be for migration use only. Idea is to remove it altogether. Not useful anymore once that migration thread is there. Later, Juan.