From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGVQl-0006ws-AU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:58:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MGVQj-0006uF-Cv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:58:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37450 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MGVQi-0006ty-VD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:58:13 -0400 Received: from lechat.rtp-net.org ([88.191.19.38]:38030) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MGVQi-0005o9-Bz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:58:12 -0400 From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/21] Fix struct termios host - target translation References: <20090615153657.GH27535@kos.to> <87eitklgzo.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> <20090616093403.GA8265@kos.to> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:01:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20090616093403.GA8265@kos.to> (Riku Voipio's message of "Tue\, 16 Jun 2009 12\:34\:03 +0300") Message-ID: <8763ewlcob.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Riku Voipio Cc: Blue Swirl , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Riku Voipio writes: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:28:43AM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote: >> Riku Voipio writes: >> Hi, >> >> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:22:36PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: >> >> On 6/12/09, riku.voipio@iki.fi wrote: >> >> > From: Arnaud Patard >> > >> >> > When converting the termios structure between host and target in >> >> > target_to_host_termios and host_to_target_termios, the c_cc[] array is >> >> > never initialised. >> >> > Calling memset() before using it allows to run successfully "stty echo / >> >> > stty -echo" on arm-linux-user target (host being x86 and mips). >> >> > >> >> > From: Arnaud Patard >> >> > Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio >> > >> >> >From != SOB. >> > >> > Arnaud, can you send your Signed-Off-By: for the patches you have sent? > >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Patard > >> Also, do you want me to reply to all your mails with the patches I've >> sent or adding my SOB here is enough for all ? > > If you say this Signed-off-by: is covers all the patches in the series, > it is enough for me. If you want to be pedantic, you can reply to all of > them. well, I wanted to avoid going through the mails and replying to them so if saying that is enough, well... it's ok. This SOB applies to all of them :) Arnaud