From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goT3X-0007LY-Nr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:04:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1goT3S-0005j3-3E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:03:59 -0500 References: <1548327184-13416-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <4aa7084c-3134-ec7b-a3ac-556a5ba9a7b7@oracle.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <8766ee08-9bba-cad3-d3a9-fc0468f61b82@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:03:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4aa7084c-3134-ec7b-a3ac-556a5ba9a7b7@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/m68k: Fix LGPL information in the file headers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Liam Merwick , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier Cc: QEMU Trivial On 2019-01-29 13:51, Liam Merwick wrote: > On 24/01/2019 10:53, Thomas Huth wrote: >> It's either "GNU *Library* General Public version 2" or "GNU Lesser >> General Public version *2.1*", but there was no "version 2.0" of the > > Should the word "License" be after both instances of "Public" above ? > >> "Lesser" library. So assume that version 2.1 is meant here. > > '"Lesser" library.' -> '"Lesser" license.' ? Right, thanks a lot for noticing! Laurent, could you please fix this when you pick this patch up? Or shall I send a v2? >> Also some files mentioned the GPL instead of the LGPL after declaring >> that the files are licensed under the LGPL, so change these spots to >> use LGPL, too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth > > changes below LGTM > > Reviewed-by: Liam Merwick Thanks! Thomas