qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
	peterx@redhat.com, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
	"Avihai Horon" <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
	"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] migration/multifd: Allow to sync with sender threads only
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 10:26:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877c8dc58x.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206005834.1050905-3-peterx@redhat.com>

Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:

> Teach multifd_send_sync_main() to sync with threads only.
>
> We already have such requests, which is when mapped-ram is enabled with
> multifd.  In that case, no SYNC messages will be pushed to the stream when
> multifd syncs the sender threads because there's no destination threads
> waiting for that.  The whole point of the sync is to make sure all threads
> flushed their jobs.

s/flushed/finished/ otherwise we risk confusing people.

>
> So fundamentally we have a request to do the sync in different ways:
>
>   - Either to sync the threads only,
>   - Or to sync the threads but also with the destination side.
>
> Mapped-ram did it already because of the use_packet check in the sync
> handler of the sender thread.  It works.
>
> However it may stop working when e.g. VFIO may start to reuse multifd
> channels to push device states.  In that case VFIO has similar request on
> "thread-only sync" however we can't check a flag because such sync request
> can still come from RAM which needs the on-wire notifications.
>
> Paving way for that by allowing the multifd_send_sync_main() to specify
> what kind of sync the caller needs.  We can use it for mapped-ram already.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/multifd.h        | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  migration/multifd-nocomp.c |  7 ++++++-
>  migration/multifd.c        | 15 +++++++++------
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.h b/migration/multifd.h
> index 50d58c0c9c..bd337631ec 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.h
> +++ b/migration/multifd.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,18 @@
>  typedef struct MultiFDRecvData MultiFDRecvData;
>  typedef struct MultiFDSendData MultiFDSendData;
>  
> +typedef enum {
> +    /* No sync request */
> +    MULTIFD_SYNC_NONE = 0,
> +    /* Sync locally on the sender threads without pushing messages */
> +    MULTIFD_SYNC_LOCAL,
> +    /*
> +     * Sync not only on the sender threads, but also push "SYNC" message to
> +     * the wire (which is for a remote sync).

s/SYNC/MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC/

Do we need to also mention that this needs to be paired with a
multifd_recv_sync_main() via the emission of the
RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_FLUSH flag on the stream?

> +     */
> +    MULTIFD_SYNC_ALL,
> +} MultiFDSyncReq;
> +
>  bool multifd_send_setup(void);
>  void multifd_send_shutdown(void);
>  void multifd_send_channel_created(void);
> @@ -28,7 +40,7 @@ void multifd_recv_shutdown(void);
>  bool multifd_recv_all_channels_created(void);
>  void multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp);
>  void multifd_recv_sync_main(void);
> -int multifd_send_sync_main(void);
> +int multifd_send_sync_main(MultiFDSyncReq req);
>  bool multifd_queue_page(RAMBlock *block, ram_addr_t offset);
>  bool multifd_recv(void);
>  MultiFDRecvData *multifd_get_recv_data(void);
> @@ -143,7 +155,7 @@ typedef struct {
>      /* multifd flags for each packet */
>      uint32_t flags;
>      /*
> -     * The sender thread has work to do if either of below boolean is set.
> +     * The sender thread has work to do if either of below field is set.
>       *
>       * @pending_job:  a job is pending
>       * @pending_sync: a sync request is pending
> @@ -152,7 +164,8 @@ typedef struct {
>       * cleared by the multifd sender threads.
>       */
>      bool pending_job;
> -    bool pending_sync;
> +    MultiFDSyncReq pending_sync;
> +
>      MultiFDSendData *data;
>  
>      /* thread local variables. No locking required */
> diff --git a/migration/multifd-nocomp.c b/migration/multifd-nocomp.c
> index 55191152f9..219f9e58ef 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd-nocomp.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd-nocomp.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ retry:
>  
>  int multifd_ram_flush_and_sync(void)
>  {
> +    MultiFDSyncReq req;
> +
>      if (!migrate_multifd()) {
>          return 0;
>      }
> @@ -356,7 +358,10 @@ int multifd_ram_flush_and_sync(void)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    return multifd_send_sync_main();
> +    /* File migrations only need to sync with threads */
> +    req = migrate_mapped_ram() ? MULTIFD_SYNC_LOCAL : MULTIFD_SYNC_ALL;
> +
> +    return multifd_send_sync_main(req);
>  }
>  
>  bool multifd_send_prepare_common(MultiFDSendParams *p)
> diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> index 498e71fd10..2248bd2d46 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int multifd_zero_copy_flush(QIOChannel *c)
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> -int multifd_send_sync_main(void)
> +int multifd_send_sync_main(MultiFDSyncReq req)
>  {
>      int i;
>      bool flush_zero_copy;

assert(req != MULTIFD_SYNC_NONE) ?

> @@ -543,8 +543,8 @@ int multifd_send_sync_main(void)
>           * We should be the only user so far, so not possible to be set by
>           * others concurrently.
>           */
> -        assert(qatomic_read(&p->pending_sync) == false);
> -        qatomic_set(&p->pending_sync, true);
> +        assert(qatomic_read(&p->pending_sync) == MULTIFD_SYNC_NONE);
> +        qatomic_set(&p->pending_sync, req);
>          qemu_sem_post(&p->sem);
>      }
>      for (i = 0; i < migrate_multifd_channels(); i++) {
> @@ -635,14 +635,17 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque)
>               */
>              qatomic_store_release(&p->pending_job, false);
>          } else {
> +            MultiFDSyncReq req = qatomic_read(&p->pending_sync);
> +
>              /*
>               * If not a normal job, must be a sync request.  Note that
>               * pending_sync is a standalone flag (unlike pending_job), so
>               * it doesn't require explicit memory barriers.
>               */
> -            assert(qatomic_read(&p->pending_sync));
> +            assert(req != MULTIFD_SYNC_NONE);
>  
> -            if (use_packets) {
> +            /* Only push the SYNC message if it involves a remote sync */
> +            if (req == MULTIFD_SYNC_ALL) {
>                  p->flags = MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC;
>                  multifd_send_fill_packet(p);
>                  ret = qio_channel_write_all(p->c, (void *)p->packet,
> @@ -654,7 +657,7 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque)
>                  stat64_add(&mig_stats.multifd_bytes, p->packet_len);
>              }
>  
> -            qatomic_set(&p->pending_sync, false);
> +            qatomic_set(&p->pending_sync, MULTIFD_SYNC_NONE);
>              qemu_sem_post(&p->sem_sync);
>          }
>      }


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-06 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-06  0:58 [PATCH v2 0/7] migration/multifd: Some VFIO / postcopy preparations on flush Peter Xu
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] migration/multifd: Further remove the SYNC on complete Peter Xu
2024-12-06 13:17   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06 14:40     ` Peter Xu
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] migration/multifd: Allow to sync with sender threads only Peter Xu
2024-12-06 13:26   ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2024-12-06 14:50     ` Peter Xu
2024-12-06 15:00       ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] migration/ram: Move RAM_SAVE_FLAG* into ram.h Peter Xu
2024-12-06 13:43   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06 15:03     ` Peter Xu
2024-12-06 15:10       ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06 15:46         ` Peter Xu
2024-12-06 16:58           ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] migration/multifd: Unify RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_FLUSH messages Peter Xu
2024-12-06 14:12   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] migration/multifd: Remove sync processing on postcopy Peter Xu
2024-12-06 14:19   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] migration/multifd: Cleanup src flushes on condition check Peter Xu
2024-12-06 14:18   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06 15:13     ` Peter Xu
2024-12-06  0:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] migration/multifd: Document the reason to sync for save_setup() Peter Xu
2024-12-06 14:40   ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-12-06 15:36     ` Peter Xu
2024-12-06 17:01       ` Fabiano Rosas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877c8dc58x.fsf@suse.de \
    --to=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).