From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: assad.hashmi@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Subject: Approaches for same-on-same linux-user execve?
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:32:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877deoevj8.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
Hi,
I came across a use-case this week for ARM although this may be also
applicable to architectures where QEMU's emulation is ahead of the
hardware currently widely available - for example if you want to
exercise SVE code on AArch64. When the linux-user architecture is not
the same as the host architecture then binfmt_misc works perfectly fine.
However in the case you are running same-on-same you can't use
binfmt_misc to redirect execution to using QEMU because any attempt to
trap native binaries will cause your userspace to hang as binfmt_misc
will be invoked to run the QEMU binary needed to run your application
and a deadlock ensues.
There are some hacks you can apply at a local level like tweaking the
elf header of the binaries you want to run under emulation and adjusting
the binfmt_mask appropriately. This works but is messy and a faff to
set-up.
An ideal setup would be would be for the kernel to catch a SIGILL from a
failing user space program and then to re-launch the process using QEMU
with the old processes maps and execution state so it could continue.
However I suspect there are enough moving parts to make this very
fragile (e.g. what happens to the results of library feature probing
code). So two approaches I can think of are:
Trap execve in QEMU linux-user
------------------------------
We could add a flag to QEMU so at the point of execve it manually
invokes the new process with QEMU, passing on the flag to persist this
behaviour.
Add path mask to binfmt_misc
----------------------------
The other option would be to extend binfmt_misc to have a path mask so
it only applies it's alternative execution scheme to binaries in a
particular section of the file-system (or maybe some sort of pattern?).
Are there any other approaches you could take? Which do you think has
the most merit?
Thanks,
--
Alex Bennée
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-07 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 14:32 Alex Bennée [this message]
2021-10-07 16:28 ` Approaches for same-on-same linux-user execve? Arnd Bergmann
2021-10-08 10:44 ` Alex Bennée
2021-10-14 13:01 ` Assad Hashmi
2021-10-07 18:59 ` Laurent Vivier
2021-10-07 19:13 ` Warner Losh
2021-10-08 11:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-10-08 11:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877deoevj8.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=assad.hashmi@linaro.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).