From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Catherine A. Frederick" <agrecascino123@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Various questions about TCG implementation, DRM patches dealing with pointers over guest-host barrier.
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 11:52:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dx9ldls.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-yTm7h_EGZ4_iKVGJ0GMFinWOyQXyKsYgs8s933Bnn1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 00:23, Catherine A. Frederick
> <agrecascino123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, I've been patching TCG for my own purposes recently and I was
>> wondering a few things. That being:
>>
<snip>
>> - I've been implementing an instruction scheduler(list scheduler, with
>> priority given to most successors) for TCG and currently if I replace
>> instructions in s->ops(the TCG context) I get a crash later in
>> tcg_reg_alloc_op, even if the instruction stream is identical. Is there
>> anything else I need to move when I do this?
>
> This one's out of my field of knowledge; Richard might know.
I'm a little unclear in what is happening here. For TCG plugins we
insert dummy ops into the stream so they can be replaced or removed at a
later phase in the translation.
>> - Is insn_start necessary to have in order(and what does it do?)? These
>> currently are serializing instructions in my scheduler and significantly
>> limit my reordering as they create lots of dependencies every few
>> instructions.
>
> The primary purpose of insn_start is to save information about the
> current instruction in a metadata
<snip>
> Finally, I haven't checked, but I suspect the new TCG plugin APIs
> implicitly assume that code for each insn is generated serially,
> ie that a plugin can do "for each instruction" type work on a
> callback that hangs off the insn_start op.
Spoiler alert: Yes it does ;-)
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-18 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-17 23:05 [RFC] Various questions about TCG implementation, DRM patches dealing with pointers over guest-host barrier Catherine A. Frederick
2020-05-18 10:21 ` Peter Maydell
2020-05-18 10:52 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2020-05-19 14:51 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dx9ldls.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=agrecascino123@gmail.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).