From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkDDC-0004Zn-Jt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:53:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkDDA-0007ts-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:53:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]:45248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkDDA-0007tg-Jo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:53:08 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id up14so2530232obb.0 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 05:53:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <20130605111044.GL31830@redhat.com> References: <1370371954-8479-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <51AF09FC.50308@suse.de> <20130605111044.GL31830@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:53:05 -0500 Message-ID: <877gi867ny.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/39] Delay destruction of memory regions to instance_finalize List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> Am 04.06.2013 20:51, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> > This series changes all PCI devices (the sole to support hotplug >> > _and_ use MemoryRegions) to do memory_region_del_subregion at >> > unrealize time, and memory_region_destroy at instance_finalize >> > time. >>=20 >> The general idea looks good. >>=20 >> Could you please follow-up with a patch that switches from exit to >> unrealize? > > What do you guys think about changing the name to something > else e.g. "free" or "destroy"? exit/unrealize !=3D free/destroy. You don't actually free anything. See 00/39 in this series for a precise description. > unrealize is not a word in english: > http://dictionary.cambridge.org/spellcheck/american-english/?q=3Dunrealize English is a fluid language. I wouldn't worry too much about that. Regards, Anthony Liguori > I can do it easily if people agree. > >> use BUS(), PCI_DEVICE() etc. to hide this. >>=20 >> Andreas >>=20 >> --=20 >> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany >> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3= =BCrnberg