From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9Gn-0002Bp-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:52:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9Gj-0002Ca-TB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:52:53 -0400 Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.142]:35956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TK9Gj-0002CQ-Ca for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 10:52:49 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 00:50:08 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay05.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q95EgtCs14680304 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 00:42:56 +1000 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q95EqdSI030392 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 00:52:40 +1000 From: Anthony Liguori In-Reply-To: <506EEE79.10608@redhat.com> References: <20120831141231.GA18777@igalia.com> <5040E1A7.4010401@suse.de> <20121005132036.GA29555@igalia.com> <506EEE79.10608@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:52:30 -0500 Message-ID: <877gr5eztd.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Ping [PATCH 0/2] Add TPCI200 and IP-Octal 232 IndustryPack emulation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Alberto Garcia , Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Paul Brook Paolo Bonzini writes: > Il 05/10/2012 15:20, Alberto Garcia ha scritto: >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >>=20 >>>> Ping >>> >>> We are currently in Hard Freeze, new devices will not get accepted >>> before the release, and our review may focus on bug fixes. >>> >>> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.2 >>> >>> I remember having had a brief look through your patches and >>> they looked pretty good modeling- and style-wise for an initial >>> submission. Don't know the hardware though and haven't tested the >>> patches so far. >>=20 >> I wrote a small blog post about the work, including a bit more >> information on how to test it: >>=20 >> http://blogs.igalia.com/berto/2012/10/03/industrypack-qemu-and-linuxcon/ >>=20 >> The patches are still available here: >>=20 >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/179657/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/179658/ >>=20 >> Is there anything else I should do in order to have this reviewed, or >> should I contact someone else? > > I think the patches are pretty good, thanks for the contribution! I'm > adding another committer to the recipients. Blue, can you take a > look? I've got them in my testing queue right now. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Paolo