From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHKNP-0003Oo-UK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:22:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHKNO-0003NX-6V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:22:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34817 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHKNN-0003NO-TC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:22:09 -0400 Received: from lechat.rtp-net.org ([88.191.19.38]:47321) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHKNN-0005Kc-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:22:09 -0400 From: Arnaud Patard (Rtp) Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] linux-user and signal handling References: <87fxdxsqks.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> <87bpolsh9o.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> <200906181735.09280.uli@suse.de> <200906181808.15408.uli@suse.de> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:27:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200906181808.15408.uli@suse.de> (Ulrich Hecht's message of "Thu\, 18 Jun 2009 18\:08\:14 +0200") Message-ID: <877hz9se21.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ulrich Hecht Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ulrich Hecht writes: > On Thursday 18 June 2009, Ulrich Hecht wrote: >> And the culprit indeed >> seems to be edf8e2af1453ce56c72b2f25a745e3734177a05d > > Specifically, it's the part in force_sig() that sets the core limit to 0 > to prevent a core dump of qemu itself that causes the wrong core bit. > Remove it, and the test passes. No idea how to fix that properly, > though. ok. That's interesting... Will look at that. Thanks a lot ! Arnaud