From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Weil" <sw@weilnetz.de>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] system/os-win32: Remove unused Error** argument in qemu_socket_unselect
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 13:01:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878qkotn5c.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHeD7oWuKE_GKF4j@redhat.com> ("Daniel P. Berrangé"'s message of "Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:50:22 +0100")
Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 12:41:31PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:35:16AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> >> @errp is always NULL. Remove it, as unused.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> include/system/os-win32.h | 2 +-
>> >> io/channel-socket.c | 4 ++--
>> >> util/oslib-win32.c | 6 +++---
>> >> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/include/system/os-win32.h b/include/system/os-win32.h
>> >> index 3aa6cee4c23..40712a948c3 100644
>> >> --- a/include/system/os-win32.h
>> >> +++ b/include/system/os-win32.h
>> >> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline void qemu_funlockfile(FILE *f)
>> >> bool qemu_socket_select(int sockfd, WSAEVENT hEventObject,
>> >> long lNetworkEvents, Error **errp);
>> >>
>> >> -bool qemu_socket_unselect(int sockfd, Error **errp);
>> >> +bool qemu_socket_unselect(int sockfd);
>> >>
>> >> /* We wrap all the sockets functions so that we can set errno based on
>> >> * WSAGetLastError(), and use file-descriptors instead of SOCKET.
>> >> diff --git a/io/channel-socket.c b/io/channel-socket.c
>> >> index 3b7ca924ff3..6ee6217e7ac 100644
>> >> --- a/io/channel-socket.c
>> >> +++ b/io/channel-socket.c
>> >> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static void qio_channel_socket_finalize(Object *obj)
>>
>> static void qio_channel_socket_finalize(Object *obj)
>> {
>> QIOChannelSocket *ioc = QIO_CHANNEL_SOCKET(obj);
>>
>> if (ioc->fd != -1) {
>> QIOChannel *ioc_local = QIO_CHANNEL(ioc);
>> if (qio_channel_has_feature(ioc_local, QIO_CHANNEL_FEATURE_LISTEN)) {
>> Error *err = NULL;
>>
>> socket_listen_cleanup(ioc->fd, &err);
>> if (err) {
>> error_report_err(err);
>> err = NULL;
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >> #ifdef WIN32
>> >> - qemu_socket_unselect(ioc->fd, NULL);
>> >> + qemu_socket_unselect(ioc->fd);
>> >> #endif
>> >
>> > It seems to me like this code should instead be using
>> > &error_warn, because the errors are still relevant and
>> > potentially a sign of a bug, but we don't want to stop
>> > this finalization path.
>>
>> Would such a warning be actionable for the user?
>>
>> Why is this failure a warning, but the failure right above is an error?
>>
>> What are the possible failures?
>>
>> On reporting errors with error_report() & friends: doing so within a
>> function that uses an Error **errp parameter to return errors is almost
>> always wrong. Can qio_channel_socket_finalize() run within such a
>> function?
>
> No finalize() function can ever propagate errors - these are run
> transparently when the "unref" drops the last reference count.
> So error_report is the best we can manage in finalize functions.
>
> It is actionable for the user in so much as if they see such
> warnings, it is sign of a code bug somewhere and this will be
> a useful diagnostic to receive in the bug report.
Then the diagnostic should tell the user this is a bug!
Messages like
warning: failed to WSAEventSelect()
show cavalier disregard for users. What is WSAEventSelect, why should I
care, is my data safe, and what am I supposed to do with this now?
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 8:35 [RFC PATCH 0/2] system/win32: Remove unused Error argument in qemu_socket_[un]select() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-07-15 8:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] system/os-win32: Remove unused Error** argument in qemu_socket_unselect Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-07-15 8:44 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2025-07-15 8:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-16 10:41 ` Markus Armbruster
2025-07-16 10:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-16 11:01 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2025-07-15 8:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] system/os-win32: Remove unused Error** argument in qemu_socket_select Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-07-15 8:44 ` Manos Pitsidianakis
2025-07-15 8:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-07-16 10:48 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878qkotn5c.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).