Re: [PATCH 08/22] gdbstub: Add num_regs member to GDBFeature

["Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>]

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:

> Hi Alex,
>
> On 6/11/23 19:50, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>> Currently the number of registers exposed to GDB is written as magic
>> numbers in code. Derive the number of registers GDB actually see from
>> XML files to replace the magic numbers in code later.
>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Message-Id: <20231025093128.33116-2-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
>
> Something in your workflow is odd, you should keep this Message-Id,
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Message-Id: <20231103195956.1998255-9-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>
> and not propagate this one, IMO.

Why not - it tracks all the review stuff. I explicitly keep on
Message-Id per domain so we see the original posting and the last time
it was posted (which you can then follow the chain of reviews from
there).

If we want to have an explicit policy on which Message-Id's to keep then
we should document it.

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro