From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, michael.roth@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sphinx/qapidoc: Tidy up pylint warning raise-missing-from
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 17:02:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r7en7tx.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8KaWXTinOLFitnYuTnqz2yXmgYdyUzE6FVFMvwwbLucA@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Maydell's message of "Fri, 3 Nov 2023 10:31:27 +0000")
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 03:08, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:10 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Pylint advises:
>> >
>> > docs/sphinx/qapidoc.py:518:12: W0707: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise ExtensionError(str(err)) from err' (raise-missing-from)
>> >
>> > From its manual:
>> >
>> > Python's exception chaining shows the traceback of the current
>> > exception, but also of the original exception. When you raise a
>> > new exception after another exception was caught it's likely that
>> > the second exception is a friendly re-wrapping of the first
>> > exception. In such cases `raise from` provides a better link
>> > between the two tracebacks in the final error.
>> >
>> > Makes sense, so do it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>
>> In this case it probably doesn't make a difference because Sphinx has
>> its own formatting for displaying the errors, but it's good hygiene.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>
> Has somebody checked that the error Sphinx shows to the user
> is still the friendly one? The only reason to raise
> this error is so that Sphinx will catch it and display
> the friendly string, so anything about tracebacks is a red
> herring -- if the traceback is shown to the user then we got
> something wrong.
The exception type doesn't change, only the backtrace stored within the
exception. Can't see how its catching could be affected.
To be sure, stick a '} at the beginning of qapi-schema.json and run
sphinx-build. Result:
Extension error:
/work/armbru/qemu/docs/../qapi/qapi-schema.json:1:1: expected '{', '[', string, or boolean
Satisfied?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 9:21 [PATCH 0/1] sphinx/qapidoc: pylint cleanups Markus Armbruster
2023-10-25 9:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] sphinx/qapidoc: Tidy up pylint warning raise-missing-from Markus Armbruster
2023-11-03 3:08 ` John Snow
2023-11-03 10:31 ` Peter Maydell
2023-11-03 16:02 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2023-11-03 16:17 ` Peter Maydell
2023-11-03 5:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] sphinx/qapidoc: pylint cleanups Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878r7en7tx.fsf@pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).