qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, michael.roth@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] sphinx/qapidoc: Tidy up pylint warning raise-missing-from
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 17:02:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r7en7tx.fsf@pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8KaWXTinOLFitnYuTnqz2yXmgYdyUzE6FVFMvwwbLucA@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Maydell's message of "Fri, 3 Nov 2023 10:31:27 +0000")

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 03:08, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 6:10 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Pylint advises:
>> >
>> >     docs/sphinx/qapidoc.py:518:12: W0707: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise ExtensionError(str(err)) from err' (raise-missing-from)
>> >
>> > From its manual:
>> >
>> >     Python's exception chaining shows the traceback of the current
>> >     exception, but also of the original exception.  When you raise a
>> >     new exception after another exception was caught it's likely that
>> >     the second exception is a friendly re-wrapping of the first
>> >     exception.  In such cases `raise from` provides a better link
>> >     between the two tracebacks in the final error.
>> >
>> > Makes sense, so do it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>>
>> In this case it probably doesn't make a difference because Sphinx has
>> its own formatting for displaying the errors, but it's good hygiene.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>
> Has somebody checked that the error Sphinx shows to the user
> is still the friendly one? The only reason to raise
> this error is so that Sphinx will catch it and display
> the friendly string, so anything about tracebacks is a red
> herring -- if the traceback is shown to the user then we got
> something wrong.

The exception type doesn't change, only the backtrace stored within the
exception.  Can't see how its catching could be affected.

To be sure, stick a '} at the beginning of qapi-schema.json and run
sphinx-build.  Result:

    Extension error:
    /work/armbru/qemu/docs/../qapi/qapi-schema.json:1:1: expected '{', '[', string, or boolean

Satisfied?



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-03 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25  9:21 [PATCH 0/1] sphinx/qapidoc: pylint cleanups Markus Armbruster
2023-10-25  9:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] sphinx/qapidoc: Tidy up pylint warning raise-missing-from Markus Armbruster
2023-11-03  3:08   ` John Snow
2023-11-03 10:31     ` Peter Maydell
2023-11-03 16:02       ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2023-11-03 16:17         ` Peter Maydell
2023-11-03  5:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] sphinx/qapidoc: pylint cleanups Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878r7en7tx.fsf@pond.sub.org \
    --to=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).