From: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
To: quintela@redhat.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Steve Sistare" <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] migration: Set migration status early in incoming side
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 09:36:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rc59j4z.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877crpclrn.fsf@secure.mitica>
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> writes:
> Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote:
>> We are sending a migration event of MIGRATION_STATUS_SETUP at
>> qemu_start_incoming_migration but never actually setting the state.
>>
>> This creates a window between qmp_migrate_incoming and
>> process_incoming_migration_co where the migration status is still
>> MIGRATION_STATUS_NONE. Calling query-migrate during this time will
>> return an empty response even though the incoming migration command
>> has already been issued.
>>
>> Commit 7cf1fe6d68 ("migration: Add migration events on target side")
>> has added support to the 'events' capability to the incoming part of
>> migration, but chose to send the SETUP event without setting the
>> state. I'm assuming this was a mistake.
>>
>> To avoid introducing a change in behavior, we need to keep sending the
>> SETUP event, even if the 'events' capability is not set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
>> ---
>> migration/migration.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
>> index 7c8292d4d4..562b78261d 100644
>> --- a/migration/migration.c
>> +++ b/migration/migration.c
>> @@ -424,13 +424,26 @@ void migrate_add_address(SocketAddress *address)
>> static void qemu_start_incoming_migration(const char *uri, Error **errp)
>> {
>> const char *p = NULL;
>> + MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
>>
>> /* URI is not suitable for migration? */
>> if (!migration_channels_and_uri_compatible(uri, errp)) {
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - qapi_event_send_migration(MIGRATION_STATUS_SETUP);
>> + migrate_set_state(&mis->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_NONE,
>> + MIGRATION_STATUS_SETUP);
>> + /*
>> + * QMP clients should have set the 'events' migration capability
>> + * if they want to receive this event, in which case the
>> + * migrate_set_state() call above will have already sent the
>> + * event. We still need to send the event for compatibility even
>> + * if migration events are disabled.
>> + */
>> + if (!migrate_events()) {
>> + qapi_event_send_migration(MIGRATION_STATUS_SETUP);
>> + }
>
> Can we add and test for a property here, so we can drop this at some
> point in the future?
>
Yes, I'll add for v2.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 18:22 [PATCH 0/6] migration: Test the new "file:" migration Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] migration: Set migration status early in incoming side Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-27 9:11 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-27 12:36 ` Fabiano Rosas [this message]
2023-06-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] tests/qtest: migration: Expose migrate_set_capability Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-27 9:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] tests/qtest: migration: Add migrate_incoming_qmp helper Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] tests/qtest: migration: Use migrate_incoming_qmp where appropriate Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-27 9:13 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] tests/qtest: migration: Add support for negative testing of qmp_migrate Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-26 18:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] tests/qtest: migration-test: Add tests for file-based migration Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-27 9:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-27 12:54 ` Fabiano Rosas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-28 16:55 [PATCH 0/6] migration: Test the new "file:" migration Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] migration: Set migration status early in incoming side Fabiano Rosas
2023-06-29 19:18 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-30 14:57 ` Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rc59j4z.fsf@suse.de \
--to=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).