From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D134AC4363D for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF6F2396D for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WR+ofLTp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0BF6F2396D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKjVn-0003ko-Od for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:43:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKjUk-0003H5-C3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:42:14 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:41216 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKjUh-0000ns-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:42:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600785730; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=C7gPHXOam1qtJzeVJKrwnIvYbOgcIDShM/Syiys8KqY=; b=WR+ofLTpj5EZSeDQGxGMSciQrHvfBPTyby33HNFMfCM1uKBU9I31DSzoQztbff4pRVbva7 pLBwa8V6pSD26huIllHADVDwiyQFGZtbg6xubJP/wxQiPn0cY5wfs3lxPGS69+7DRz0ssq w2qJn93LBXplr6iBc24tlU6ahij3WyY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-463-jbTIy_yBM8yTjS1wSEENQg-1; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:42:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: jbTIy_yBM8yTjS1wSEENQg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC39801F99; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-114-66.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.66]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DED3E60C05; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74ACF1132E9A; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:42:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/20] docs/interop: Convert qemu-ga-ref to rST References: <20200810195019.25427-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <20200810195019.25427-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <875z8t7kd0.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <87wo0mqavm.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> <873639q4qx.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:42:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Peter Maydell's message of "Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:21:49 +0100") Message-ID: <878sd1ooub.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=armbru@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.120; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/22 01:57:21 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.455, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Peter Maydell writes: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 15:13, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> Peter Maydell writes: >> >> > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 13:01, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> >> If you'd prefer to (re-)add it later, stick in TODO comment. >> > >> > Where would you want a TODO to be ? >> >> Before the patch, the licensing information is in >> docs/interop/qemu-ga-ref.texi. That file gets replaced by >> docs/interop/qemu-ga-ref.rst, losing the licensing information. What >> about putting the TODO right there? > > I can if you insist, but what makes that .rst file any > different from all the other .rst files we have in docs/ > which go into our various manuals and don't have explicit > licensing comments or reader-visible text? > > If we want to improve how we inform readers of the docs > license, we might: > * add a license note to the existing copyright footer line > * or to have every page to have a larger copyright/license > text section at the bottom > * or to have the interop and other manuals have a license.rst > like the system manual does currently, > and none of those changes would require editing qemu-ga-ref.rst > or qemu-qmp-ref.rst, because the overall problem being addressed > isn't specific to those parts of the documentation, it's a > wider one that you'd fix in a different place. My first preference is keeping the licensing information. How to keep it is up to you. If you'd prefer not to in this series, then all I ask for is a reminder *somewhere* that we've lost licensing information, and should put it back. You choose where to put it and how to phrase it. But since you asked, I made a suggestion. Feel free to choose anther place or phrasing.